突破式創新之知識擴散速率研究

Research on the speed of geographical knowledge diffusion of breakthrough innovation

莊庚樺(Keng-Hua Chuang)

指導教授 ： 蘇信寧

國立交通大學/管理學院/科技管理研究所/碩士(2020年)

摘要

加速創新不僅能增加成功創新的可能性，亦帶來可持續的競爭優勢。而知識的擴散能為創新活動提供良好的動能，且知識的獲取亦被視為提升創新速率的方式，若能藉由不同的角度探討知識的擴散與其擴散速率，亦能對此領域有更廣泛的了解。本研究使用地理性角度，衡量知識的擴散，將單位時內，地理的知識擴散距離，衡量出地理的知識擴散速率，並設定創新相關指標為自變數，搭配回歸分析，藉此了解影響突破性創新技術於地理層面之知識擴散速率，與其中所透露出的創新意涵。研究結果表明，相對進入門檻較低之知識，能夠有效地提升後續的知識擴散速率，管理者若以知識擴散布局為策略方向，可以此為參考依據，並做出相應之調整。

關鍵字

突破式創新 ； 創新速率 ； 知識擴散 ； 專利

並列摘要

Accelerating innovation not only increases the likelihood of successful innovation, but also brings sustainable competitive advantage. The diffusion of knowledge can provide good energy for innovation, and the acquisition of knowledge is also regarded as a way to increase innovation speed. If we can explore the diffusion of knowledge and its diffusion speed from different ways, we can also have a broader understand in this field. This research uses a geographic perspective to measure the diffusion of knowledge. We measure the speed of geographic knowledge diffusion per unit time, and set innovation-related indicators as independent variables, and then use regression analysis to understand the impact of breakthrough innovative technologies on the geographic level and its implications. The results show that knowledge with relatively low entry barriers can effectively increase the speed of knowledge diffusion. Managers who use knowledge diffusion as a strategic direction can use this as a reference and make corresponding adjustments.

並列關鍵字

Breakthrough Innovation ； Innovation Speed ； Knowledge Flow ； Patent

參考文獻

Blind, K., Cremers, K., & Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy, 38(2), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.003

Harhoff, Dietmar, Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5

Knott, A. M. (2003). Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.326

Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696401

Marco, A. C. (2005). The option value of patent litigation: Theory and evidence. Review of Financial Economics, 14(3–4), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2004.09.003