透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.190.167
  • 期刊

從歐體生技產品爭端之裁決論SPS協定對GMO規範之影響

Considering the Applicability of the SPS Agreement to GMOs in Terms of the Panel Report in the EC-Biotech Dispute

摘要


「歐體-影響生技產品核可與上市措施」爭端案(European Communities-Measures affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products,以下簡稱EC-Biotech)係WTO首件GMO貿易爭端案,自其於2006年9月發佈以來,即受到各界極大的關注。在長達二千多頁的報告中,小組作出許多值得探討及具開創性之裁決,對未來WTO處理GMO爭端具有指引性之潛在影響。本文之目的,係以EC-Biotech案之裁決爲基礎,探討SPS協定對GMO之適用,對會員規範GMO風險造成之衝擊。在架構安排上,本文首先介紹歐體核可生技產品上市之運作與程序。其次,將從SPS措施之目的、形式及性質要素之角度,探討本案所涉特定GMO措施是否構成SPS措施。就此部份,主要之關切在於GMO風險爲SPS風險、禁止GMO產品進口及GMO標示等論辯。再者,本文將個別分析GMO上市核可之不當遲延、實施風險評估與SPS預防措施等爭點,並作出結論。本文作者將提出其對本案爭端裁決之疑問及評析,以爲貢獻。

並列摘要


European communities-Measures affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, the first WTO dispute settlement report involving GMOs disputes, has received enormous publicity since its recent issuance in September 2006. In more than two thousands of pages of the panel report, many noteworthy and innovative findings were contained and have the potential to direct future changes handling GMOs in the context of the WTO. This paper will address how the applicability of the SPS Agreement to GMOs impacts the countries which want to regulate the possible risks arising from GMOs in terms of the rulings adjudicated in the Bio-tech dispute. Second Ⅱ will first provide an overall review of the operation and application by the European Communities of its regime for approval of bio-tech products. Section Ⅲ will examine whether a relevant GMO measure constitutes an SPS measure, viewing from the perspective of the purpose, form and nature elements indicated by the text of SPS Agreement. On this point, particular concerns will be placed on the arguments as to GMOs as an SPS risk, a prohibition on the importation of GMOs and GMOs labeling. In the remaining parts of this paper, the issues on undue delay in the approval of bio-tech products, the undertaking of risk assessment and SPS-type precautionary measures will be analyzed. The concluding remarks of this paper will be provided in section Ⅵ. In this paper, the author will provide her questions and comments on the panel's findings as a contribution.

參考文獻


牛惠之(2006)。預防原則之研究:國際環境法處理欠缺科學證據之環境風險議題之努力與爭議。臺大法學論叢。34(3),1-71。
EC-Biotech: Overview and Analysis of the Panel`s Interim Report
Research Paper
Genetic Engineering and the WTO: an Analysis of the Report in the "EC-Biotech" Case
Kerr, William(1999).International Trade in Transgenic Food Products: A New Focus for Agricultural Trade Disputes.World Economy.22(2),245-249.

被引用紀錄


吳又茗(2010)。歐盟與美國訴諸WTO有關生技(GMO)產品貿易爭端案的衝突與解決〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00154
Chen, H. C. (2010). WTO爭端解決小組就GMO爭議之裁決分析-以SPS Agreement第2.2條、第5.1條及第5.7條之解釋及適用為主 [master's thesis, National Chiao Tung University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2010.00406
歐博翔(2009)。跨國性科技規範模式之建構──以歐盟基因改造生物規範為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.00387

延伸閱讀