透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.243.32
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

婚姻暴力加害人處遇與司法體系之連結

Enhancing the Coordinated Function between Batterer Intervention Programs and the Legal System

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


婚姻暴力是犯罪行爲也是嚴重的社會問题,不但造成家庭中每一成員的傷害,國家社會也须爲付上極大代價。自家庭暴力防治法通過之後,受暴婦女可循法律途径保障自己的權益,並要求施暴者完成加害人處遇計劃。其目的在協助施暴者修正其個人之暴力與控制行為,以保障受暴婦女和子女的安全。然而僅藉由加害人處遇計劃之單一連作並無法達成此目標,而必须與在防治家庭暴力工作中扮演主導、連结、防治等重要角色的司法體系形成坚强整合的防暴綱絡,以促進施暴者承檐暴力責任。本文即針對加害人處遇計劃之法律依據、背景發展、理谕基礎、實施現況、處遇成效、和促進與司法系统連结等方面進行討論。如果司法系统中法庭的積極行動、检察官之偵查與起訴、警察的介入逮捕、法院堅督制度等所有環節都能封婚姻暴力產生積極回應,讓施暴者因此體驗到国家社會不容許家庭中任何型式暴力的立場,俾能使加害人處遇計劃的實驗實施發挥最大效果。因此家庭暴力加害人處系统,能與司法罕會各綱絡形成嚴密和責信的防暴機制,才能遏阻婚暴發生,追而影響社會重新建構非暴力的新文化。

並列摘要


Battering is a crime and social problem. It inflicts tremendous harm to society in terms of physical and psychological injury to victims and their children. After the domestic violence prevention law has been constituted in Taiwan, the battered women can protect their own rights through judicial ways and demand the batterers to attend batterer intervention programs in order to correct their violent behaviors. This article reviews the judicial bases, historical background, theories and philosophy, current program models, outcomes of batterer intervention programs, and the connections between legal system and batterer intervention programs. Because batterer intervention programs can not reduce domestic violence in isolation, a strong, accountable, and coordinated justice response can have a significant influence on the efficacy of batterer intervention programs. The combined impact of trying, arresting, prosecution adjudication, and intense court monitoring may send strong and consistent messages to batterers about their responsibilities of violent behaviors. Because batterer intervention programs can only change individual abusive behaviors, a coordinated community response through cooperative work among community organizations, criminal justice systems, victim advocates, mental health institutions, education agencies, social services, and religious groups can build new non-violent culture in order to deter domestic violence effectively.

參考文獻


陳高凌(2001)。義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡面的運作及其對治療之啓示。本土心理學研究。14,62-112。
陳若璋(1992)。台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊。3,117-147。
Austin,Dankwort(1998).Violence Against Woman Online Resources.
Bartholomew, D.,Mitchell, S.,Zegree J.(1997).Domestic Violence Perpetrator Treatment Workshop.Washington:
Violence Against Women Online Resources

被引用紀錄


柳宜吟(2008)。婚暴婦女撤銷民事保護令因素與影響之研究-以高雄市為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2008.00173
黃裕紋(2017)。家庭暴力防治法刑事保護令:制度分析與刑事司法人員回應之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702778
王茲繐(2008)。婚姻暴力加害人處遇方案對於加害人家庭系統影響之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.00496
潘雅惠(2012)。法官繼續專業教育需求與內涵之研究:以辦理民事保護令事件法官為例〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613531904
王於磬(2013)。家庭暴力安全防護網高危機個案解除列管指標再評估之研究~以台中市為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042865

延伸閱讀