Title

從生產、 生活及生態觀點檢視台灣地區縣市永續發展差異性之研究

Translated Titles

Examining the Potential of Sustainable Development for Taiwan Cities from Economic, Living, And Ecological Perspectives

Authors

馮君君(Jiun-Jiun Ferng);黃書禮(Shu-Li Huang);羅登旭(Teng-Hsu Lo)

Key Words

永續發展 ; 衡量指標 ; 群落分析 ; 發展策略 ; Sustainable development ; Indicators ; Cluster analysis ; Development strategies

PublicationName

都市與計劃

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

27卷2期(2000 / 09 / 01)

Page #

117 - 139

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

檢視一地區發展的基礎以具有減損益此基礎的外力大小,為探討永續發展的重要課題。本文用「國土綜合開發計畫」所揭櫫的三項目標:建設生產環境、改善生活品質、及維護生態環境,做為檢視面向,並且延續先前研究建議之都市永續發展指標項目,從中採用合適本研究界定的檢視面向、時間尺度、以及地理空間基本單元,再配合「壓力─狀態─反應」指標架構,展現指標與永續發展觀念間之關聯性,俾益提供檢視一都市有關永續發展的基礎以及具有減損或增益此基礎的外力。接著,本研究將歸屬於生產、生活、及生態三生面向的單項指標群,以線性方式,組合成複合指數,檢視台灣地區23縣市在民國70、75、80、及85年四個時間點上,有關三生面向複合數值的變動情形。此外,本研究以民國85年23縣市三生面向的複合指數值為依據,進行群落分析,展現23縣市在永續發展基礎上的相對差異性,並以分類結果為架構,研提加強三生基礎之策略。

English Abstract

To examine the base of development for an economy and to measure the force which can undermine or strengthen the base are important on the subject of sustainable development. This paper examines the 23 cities of Taiwan from the perspective of economic, living, and ecological status, which arc the objectives proposed in the document of National Comprehensive Landuse Development Plan. The status of these three aspects was measured by 19 indicators from previous studies for sustainable cities in accordance with the ”pressure-state-response” indicator framework, at the time of 1981,1986, 1991, and 1996. These indicators were then aggregated into three composite indexes, which were then used to indicate the change in the status of the three aspects during the 15 years and compare the differences among the 23 cities. In addition, this research used cluster analysis to classify the potential of sustainable development for the 23 cities according to their economic, living, and ecological status in 1996. The result was then used as a framework to propose strategies for implementing sustainability for these cities.

Topic Category 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
Reference
  1. Azar, C., Holmberg, J., Lindgren, K.(1996).Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability.Ecological Economics,18
  2. Brink, B. ten(1991).In Search of Sustainable Development.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Brundtland''s World Commission on Environment and Development(1987).Our Common Future.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  4. Daly, H. E.(1990).Toward Some Operational Principles of Sustainable Development.Ecological Economics,2
  5. Graaf, H. J. de, Muster, C. J. M., ter Keurs, W. J.(1996).Sustainable Development: Looking for New Strategies.Ecological Economics,16
  6. Hanley, N. I. Moffatt, Faichney, R., Wilson, M.(1999).Measuring Sustainability: A Time Series of Alternative Indicators for Scotland.Ecological Economics,28
  7. Howard, P. J. A., Howard, D. M.(1981).Multivariate Analysis of Map Data: A Case Study in Classification and Dissection.Journal of Environmental Management,13
  8. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, UNEP, WWF(1980).World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN/ UNEP/ WWF.
  9. IUCN, UNEP, WWF(1991).Caring for the Earth.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
  10. Lohani, B. N., Todino, G.(1984).Water Quality Index for Chao Phraya River.Journal of Environmental Engineering,110(6)
  11. Mitchell, B.(1993).Geography andResource Analysis.New York:Longman Scientific and Technical.
  12. Opschoor, H., Reijnders, L.(1991).In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  13. Pearce, D. W., Tunner, R. K.(1990).Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment.New York, NY:
  14. Rennings, K., Wiggering, H.(1997).Steps Towards Indicators of Sustainable Development: Linking Economic and Ecological Concepts.Ecological Economics,20
  15. Sustainable Seattle(1993).The Sustainable Seattle 1993 Indicators of Sustainable Community: A Report to Citizens on Long-term Trends in Our Community.Seattle, WA:Sustainable Seattle.
  16. The United Nations Centre for Human Settlements(1995).Using indicators in policy.Indicators Newsletter,3
  17. Verbruggen, H., Kuik, O.(1991).In Search of Sustainable Development.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  18. 行政院經濟建設委員會(1996)。國土綜合開發計畫。行政院經濟建設委員會。
  19. 李永展 Lee, Yung-Jaan(1998)。國土資源永續利用體系與永續性指標建立。行政院國家科學委員會環境涵容能力與永續發展研討會,國立中興大學:
  20. 黃書禮 Huang, Shu-Li(1996)。台北市都市永續發展指標與策略研擬之研究。台北市政府都市發展局。
Times Cited
  1. 詹皇賢(2010)。中部科學工業園區后里基地之研究:互動治理之觀點。中興大學國家政策與公共事務研究所學位論文。2010。1-225。 
  2. 郭幸福(2010)。都市土地發展之環境轉變效率影響因素之研究。成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。2010。1-160。 
  3. 李奕樵(2010)。生態社區綠營建之碳排放外部效應財務模擬。成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。2010。1-228。 
  4. 周鶴樹(2010)。從景觀生態格局與變遷探索台灣國家公園的永續規劃—以玉山國家公園為例。中原大學設計學博士學位學程學位論文。2010。1-218。 
  5. 簡嘉儀(2009)。社區永續環境指標之建構。長榮大學土地管理與開發研究所學位論文。2009。1-92。
  6. 歐宗園(2012)。聯合國永續發展指標權重之探討-層級分析法之應用。朝陽科技大學環境工程與管理系學位論文。2012。1-120。