Title

桃園陂塘活化方案決策評估之研究

Translated Titles

Revitalization Project Assessment Study of the Evaluation for the Farm Ponds in Taoyuan

DOI

10.6128/CP.201809_45(3).0003

Authors

江志成(Chih-Cheng Chiang);邱英浩(Yin-Hao Chiu)

Key Words

陂塘 ; 水圳 ; 活化 ; 永續發展 ; 模糊德爾菲(FDM) ; 分析網絡程序法(ANP) ; 折衷排序法(VIKOR) ; 重要程度-績效水準分析(IPA)(Importance-PerformanceAnalysis, IPA) ; Farm pond ; Irrigation waterway ; Revitalization ; Sustainable development ; Fuzzy Delphi method ; Analytic network process ; VIKOR ; Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)

PublicationName

都市與計劃

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

45卷3期(2018 / 09 / 30)

Page #

237 - 256

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

陂塘為人工構築之地景,過去做為農業灌溉之用,由於都市發展與經濟環境演變,水利設施興闢造成陂塘經濟功能限縮,使陂塘地形也急遽變遷與轉型,生態環境亦受到衝擊與破壞,面臨快速消失的危機。如何活化陂塘及永續發展,和經濟及城市永續發展或灌溉技術日益密切及重要,成為必須面對的重要課題。本研究將以兩個以上不同研究方法針對陂塘活化過程分析探討,採用模糊德爾菲方法(Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM)研擬評估因子,再以分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)決策模式工具,求取各待決方案的優先順序權值,依此選出最佳陂塘活化與永續發展發展方向與模式。最終以折衷排序法(塞爾維亞語VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, VIKOR)與重要程度-績效水準分析(Importance-Performance Analysis, IPA)進行方案現況滿意度之評估,並提出未來可改善之處。研究結果發現陂塘活化模式中,透過限制開發維持陂塘自然環境之完整性為最優先之方案,且可知環境保護限制開發為最優先需改善之方案,其驗證將可作為桃園陂塘整體發展關鍵評估準則與方案。

English Abstract

As a specific manmade landscape, farm ponds were mainly used for agricultural irrigation. Due to the urban development and economic environment change, the function of farm ponds has decreased while the construction of the water conservancy facilities increased. It also resulted in the crisis of the farm ponds vanishing. In recent years, as the global warming and climate change become more intensive, farm ponds accidentally play the important role for palliation. Therefore, the issue to revitalize the farm ponds and make the environment more sustainable, while keeping promoting the economic growth and developing the technology of irrigation has got critical. In this research, Fussy Delphi method was applied to propose evaluation indicators of farm ponds conservation and regeneration projects. Afterwards, the study applied Analytic Network Process method through group discussion to obtain the priority value of each project. Accordingly, we found the optimal pattern of the farm ponds revitalization and the way for sustainable development. Finally, we assessed the satisfaction of the revitalization projects by VIKOR and Importance- Performance Analysis was applied to score the importance and satisfaction of the indicators. This study focuses on the farm ponds in Taoyuan and the key guidelines and the revitalization project mechanism of the farm ponds are discussed by considering the stakeholders, such as the public sector, developers, landlords, conservation group and the communities. We set up the assessment model through spatial analysis and expert questionnaire methods. The result shows that the best pattern of revitalization is limiting the exploitation to maintain the natural environment integrity of the farm ponds. This research is expected to be a reference for local government to evaluate the development projects of the farm ponds and set up the revitalization policies in the future.

Topic Category 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
Reference
  1. 王价巨、張馨心(2016)。埤塘與滯洪空間關聯性探討—以桃園為例。都市與計劃,43(2),157-187。
    連結:
  2. 吳杰穎、黃昱翔(2011)。颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立:以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃,38(2),195-218。
    連結:
  3. 陳桓敦、鍾政偉、蔡進祥、王維民(2008)。桃園地區埤塘永續觀光之發展策略研究。休閒暨觀光產業研究,2(2),105-122。
    連結:
  4. Blayac, T.,Mathé, S.,Rey-Valette, H.,Fontaine, P.(2014).Perceptions of the services provided by pond fish farming in Lorraine (France).Ecological Economics,108,115-123.
  5. Chen, Q.,Guo, X.,Hua, G.,Li, G.,Feng, R.,Liu, X.(2017).Migration and degradation of swine farm tetracycline's at the river catchment scale: Can the multi-pond system mitigate pollution risk to receiving rivers?.Environmental Pollution,220(B),1301-1310.
  6. Clawson, M.,Stewart, C. L.(1965).Land Use Information, A Critical Survey of U.S. Statistics Including Possibilities for Greater Uniformity.Baltimore:The Johns Hopskins.
  7. Hawes, J. M.,Rao, C. P.(1985).Using importance-performance analysis to develop health care marketing strategies.Journal of Health Care Marketing,5(4),19-25.
  8. Hollenhorst, S.,Olson, D.,Fortney, R.(1992).Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: The case of the West Virginia state park system.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,10(1),1-11.
  9. Hüse, B.,Szabó, S.,Deák, B.,Tóthmérésza, B.(2016).Mapping an ecological network of green habitat patches and their role in maintaining urban biodiversity in and around Debrecen city (Eastern Hungary).Land Use Policy,57,574-581.
  10. Ishikawa, A.,Amagasa, M.,Shiga, T.,Tomizawa, G.,Tatsuta, R.,Mieno, H.(1993).The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55(3),241-253.
  11. Kristensen, S. B. P.,Busck, A. G.,van der Sluis, T.,Gaube, V.(2016).Patterns and drivers of farm-level land use change in selected European rural landscapes.Land Use Policy,57,786-799.
  12. Liou, J. J.,Tsai, C. Y.,Lin, R. H.,Tzeng, G. H.(2011).A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality.Journal of Air Transport Management,17(2),57-61.
  13. Matzler, K.,Bailom, F.,Hinterhuber, H. H.,Renal, B.,Pichler, J.(2004).The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis.Industrial Marketing Management,33(4),271-277.
  14. Opricovic, S.(1998).Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
  15. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2004).Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.European Journal of Operational Research,156(2),445-455.
  16. Sanfo, S.,Barbier, B.,Dabiré, I. W. P.,Vlek, P. L. G.,Fonta, W. M.,Ibrahim, B.,Barry, B.(2017).Rainfall variability adaptation strategies: An ex-ante assessment of supplemental irrigation from farm ponds in southern Burkina Faso.Agricultural Systems,152,80-89.
  17. Satty, T. L.(1996).The Analytic Network Process.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications.
  18. Shih, W.(2017).Greenspace patterns and the mitigation of land surface temperature in Taipei metropolis.Habitat International,60,69-80.
  19. Turner, B. L.,Skole, D.,Sanderson, S.,Fischer, G.,Fresco, L.,Leemans, R.(1995).International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) ReportInternational Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Report,Stockholm:IGBP.
  20. 方偉達(2009)。城鄉:生態規劃、設計與批判。臺北:六和出版社。
  21. 方偉達、陸國先、張尊國(2004)。桃園臺地陂塘冬季鳥類微棲地空間形態分析。2004年農業工程研討會論文集,臺北:
  22. 台灣歷史資源經理學會(2009)。,桃園:桃園縣政府。
  23. 行政院農業委員會(2007)。農業水資源管理策略與灌溉管理相關業務檢討。臺北:行政院農業委員會。
  24. 范佐東(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所。
  25. 桃園縣政府文化局(2004)。,桃園:桃園縣政府。
  26. 翁婉茹(2007)。水圳從自然、文化、休閒角度再利用。行政院農業委員會農政與農情,184
  27. 財團法人桃園農田水利研究發展基金會(2007)。,桃園:桃園縣政府。
  28. 財團法人農業工程研究中心(2011)。,桃園:財團法人農業工程研究中心。
  29. 張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及估計。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
  30. 陳正祥(1993)。台灣地誌(原敷明產業地理研究所報告第94 號)。臺北:南天書局。
  31. 陳其澎(2012)。以桃園縣陂圳空間網絡為基礎的一個國土治理架構的擬議。第四屆發展研究年會—跨X:風險與正義,臺北:
  32. 陳其澎、羅婷婷、鄭國賢、劉厚君(2003)。行政院客家委員會委託研究報告行政院客家委員會委託研究報告,臺北:客家委員會。
  33. 黃浩珽(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所。
  34. 楊淑玲(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所。
  35. 鄭滄濱(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理學系。
  36. 謝勝彥(2004)。提升桃園水利會灌區陂塘供水潛能之探討。桃園大圳水資源暨營運管理學術研討會,桃園:
Times Cited
  1. 龔沅希、葉奠邦、洪志洋、李宗耀(2018)。探討智慧家庭系統市場需求功能與技術設計之規格及對應產品競爭定位分析。科技管理學刊,23(4),27-56。