Title

Graphical Comparison of World University Rankings

DOI

10.6197/HEED.2014.0801.01

Authors

Philippe Vidal;Ghislaine Filliatreau

Key Words

Quantitative ; Comparison ; University Rankings

PublicationName

Higher Education Evaluation and Development

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

8卷1期(2014 / 06 / 01)

Page #

1 - 14

Content Language

英文

English Abstract

In order to provide new light on the deep debate about discrepancies between world University ranking results, an attempt is made to compare them on a rigorous quantitative basis, using an original methodology. Three well known rankings, namely Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Times Higher Education (THE) and Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) rankings are compared by means of ternary and binary diagrams for their 2010-2011-2012 editions. Four countries or culturally consistent sets of countries are analyzed: the United States, the United Kingdom, Northern Europe (Germany, Netherlands, Scandinavia), Southern Europe (France, Italy, Portugal, Spain). The most established ranking, ARWU, being taken as the reference of activity in research, it is observed that the THE and QS rankings globally underestimate universities best ranked for research and overestimate universities less well ranked for research. More specifically they underestimate the US, Northern and Southern Europe, and overestimate the UK universities. These observations just point out that reputation surveys, which represent a very significant weight in THE and QS rankings, could be the most relevant-and puzzling factor to explain for the overall differences of results between the three rankings.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
  2. Huang, M. H.(2012).Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings.Research Evaluation,21,71-78.
  3. Marginson, S.,van der Wende, M.(2007).To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education.Journal of Studies in International Education,11,306-329.
  4. Rauhvargers, A.(2013).Global university rankings and their impact-Report II.
  5. Suh, E.(2012).Myths of peer review and facts.IREG-6 conference: The academic rankings and advancement of higher education-Lessons from Asia and other regions,Taipei, Taiwan:
  6. van Raan, A. F. J.(2005).Challenges in ranking of universities.First International Conference on World Class Universities,Shangai, China:
  7. Vidal, P.,Filliatreau, G.(2011).La place de l'Europe méridionale dans la recherche sur l'enseignement supérieur.Revue Internationla d'Education de Sèvres,56,21-23.
Times Cited
  1. 陳軒儀(2018)。建築師在越南「印度支那建築樣式」形成中扮演的角色。臺灣大學藝術史研究所學位論文。2018。1-140。 
  2. 呂宗龍(2006)。用於圖形化編輯器開發之專屬模型語言設計。政治大學資訊科學學系學位論文。2006。1-100。
  3. 林怡君(2006)。怪誕的存有,優雅的死亡- 湯姆斯.羅蘭森的《英國死亡之舞》。中央大學藝術學研究所學位論文。2006。1-158。