Title

我國中學生平衡迷思概念和心智模式之研究

Authors

鄧雅文

Key Words

化學平衡 ; 迷思概念 ; 心智模式 ; misconceptions ; metal models ; chemical equilibrium

PublicationName

臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2003年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

邱美虹

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究的主要目的在於探討我國國中及高中學生有關平衡概念之迷思概念及心智模式的類型。研究對象是取自國中學生合計共229人、高級中學學生共403人。 研究重點以國中理化、高中基礎化學、物質科學化學篇、選修化學教材為主,統整其中的平衡概念,建立重要的教學目標,據此完成概念圖及命題陳述以發展相關工具(包含開放式紙筆測驗及晤談),並根據所得的資籵再發展成二階段診斷測驗,試題的第一部分是檢驗學生對概念了解的正確性,第二部分是探就學生之所以具有此種認知的理由,再作定性及定量的分析,找出學生的迷思概念及其背後所隱含之心智模式類型。茲將主要研究結果摘錄如下: 一、我國中學學生學習平衡發生迷思概念最多的單元在:動平衡、勒沙特列原理、反應速率與其影響因素、化學反應方程式等。 二、心智模式可以分成直觀模式、語言模式、記憶錯誤連結模式、臆測模式、推理錯誤模式和原理誤用模式。 三、在平衡單元中迷思概念隨年級增加而下降的是:化學反應方程式、催化劑對反應速率的影響。 四、迷思概念之主要成因應和錯誤推論、名詞誤用、經驗錯用、勒沙特列原理錯誤推理、和誤用概念、質量守?睅伬P錯誤推論有關。 本研究結果所呈現的學生迷思概念類型及其比例可作為教師教學時的參考資料庫。

English Abstract

This study is aimed to explore the result of comprehensive level on misconceptions and metal models about chemical equilibrium with junior high school and senior high school pupils. There were 229 junior high and 403 senior high school pupils for clinic interviews and further discussions. This study was based on the present physical textbooks for junior high school pupils and chemistry science textbooks for senior high school pupils. It attempted to integrate the concepts of chemical equilibrium mentioned in those textbooks, to construct concept maps, propositional statements, and then a two-tier test questionnaire. This study employed open-ended paper-and-pencil questionnaire, interviewing questionnaire, and a set of two tier test items. The first tier was examined content knowledge and pupils’ understanding of that knowledge in the second. Analyses of the quantitative and qualitative data were done according to the pupils’ responses in order to find the types of misconceptions and mental models. The following were the main conclusions of this study: 1. Most misconception happened in: dynamic equilibrium, Le Chatelier principle, reaction rate and effect, and chemical reaction equations. 2. The mental model were divided into intuitional model, linguistic model, incorrect connection memory model, supposed model, wrong inference model, and principle misapplied model. 3. In the section of chemical equilibrium, the misconceptions held by the pupils were eliminated when the grades increase; they were chemical reaction equations and catalyst influence for reaction rate. 4. The results of misconceptions were related to incorrect inferences, misused terms, inappropriate experiences, incorrect inference of Le Chatelier Principle, misused concepts , and incore inference of conservation . Teachers might furthermore take research results as reference to clarify students’ misconceptions revealed by the study.

Topic Category 理學院 > 科學教育研究所在職進修碩士班
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. 史嘉章 (2002)發展二階層試題以探討國高中學生氣體迷思概念。國立
    連結:
  2. 台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  3. 林宏一 (1980):大一與高三學生「化學平衡」解題過程與行為之分析。
    連結:
  4. 李世峰 (2002)高中學生應用勒沙特列原理判斷非均勻相系化學平衡的迷
    連結:
  5. 思概念探討。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  6. 姚錦棟 (2002)我國中學生酸鹼鹽迷思概念和心智模式之研究。國立台
    連結:
  7. 灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  8. 洪瑞英 (1998 )高中生的「化學平衡」概念之研究。國立高雄師範大學
    連結:
  9. 影響之研究-勒沙特列原理。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩
    連結:
  10. 蔡文錦 (1991)發展紙筆測驗以探究高三學生對化學平衡的迷思概念。
    連結:
  11. 蔡文錦、陳瓊森 (1992)發展紙筆測驗以探究高三學生對化學平衡的迷
    連結:
  12. 劉嘉茹 (2000)以研究綱領與本體分類論探究概念改變機制之研究。國立
    連結:
  13. 台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。
    連結:
  14. 劉俊庚 (2002)迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析-以概念構圖和
    連結:
  15. 後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所
    連結:
  16. Banerjee, A. C.(1995). Teaching Chemical equilibrium and thermodynamics in undergraduate general chemistry classes. Journal of chemical Education , (72), 879-881
    連結:
  17. Banerjee, Anil C.(1991). Misconceptions of Students and Teachers in Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13 (4), 487-94 .
    連結:
  18. Furio, C.; Calatayud, M. L; Barcenas, S.L.;Padilla, O.M.(2000) Functional Fixedness and Functional Reduction as common Sense Reasonings in chemical Equilibrium and in Geometry and Polarity of Molecules, Science Education, 84(5),545-565.
    連結:
  19. Garnett & Hackling(1995) Student` alternative conceptions in Chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education,25,69-95.
    連結:
  20. Gorodetsky, M.,& Hoz, R. (1985).Changes in the group cognitive structure of some chemical equilibrium concepts following a university course in general chemistry. Science Education, 69, 185-199.
    連結:
  21. Gorodetsky, M.,&Gussarsky, E.(1986). Misconceptuallization of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods, European Journal of Science Education,8(4),427-441.
    連結:
  22. Gussarsky, E.,& Gorodetsky, M.(1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept : constrained word associations and conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 25(5), 319-333.
    連結:
  23. Gussarsky, E.,& Gorodetsky, M. (1990)On the concept“chemical equilibrium” The associative framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 27,(3),197-204.
    連結:
  24. Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. Eurpean Journal of Science Education,7(2),205-214.
    連結:
  25. Huddle, A.& Bill ay, A.E.(1996) An in-depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 33(1),65-77.
    連結:
  26. JaniceM. Wilson.(1994) Network Representations of knowledge about Chemical Equilibrium Variations with Achievement. Journal of Research in science Teaching , 31(10),1133-1147.
    連結:
  27. Maskill, R. & Cachapuz, A.F.C. (1989) Learning about the chemistry topic of equilibrium : a study of the use of word association tests to developing conceptualization. International Journal of Science Education,11(1),57-69.
    連結:
  28. Moises, C.& Ron, G. (1989) Problem solving and chemical equilibrium : successful versus unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(3),251-271.
    連結:
  29. Niaz, M(1995) Relationship between student performance on conceptual and computation al problems of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education,17(3)343-355.
    連結:
  30. Quilez-Pardo,J.& Solarz-Portroles , J.J (1995) Students’ and teachers’ misapplication of Le Chatelier’s Principle : implications for the teaching of chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32,939-957
    連結:
  31. Robert R. Buell and Gertrude A, Bradley (1972) Piagetian Studies In Science: Chemical Equilibrium Understanding from Study of Solubility: A Preliminary Report from Secondary School Chemistry. Science Education , 56(1).
    連結:
  32. Voska, Kirk W.; Heikkinen, Henry W.(2000) Indentification and Analysis of Student Conceptions Used To solve Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(2),160-176.
    連結:
  33. Wheeler, A.E. & Kass, H. International Journal of Science Education Student misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. Science Education , 62(2),223∼232.
    連結:
  34. 一、 中文部分:
  35. 邱美虹 (1994)從自我解釋所產生的推論探究高中生化學平衡的學習。
  36. 師大學報,39,489-524。
  37. 高紹源 (1996)閱讀高中化學教科書後對高一學生所具有之謎思概念
  38. 士論文。
  39. 陳彥杰 (1997)學生對化學平衡迷失概念之研究。國立高雄師範大學
  40. 科學教育研究所碩士論文。
  41. 國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
  42. 思概念並應用以發展教學診斷工具。國立彰化師範大學學報,12,
  43. 149-174。
  44. 碩士論文。
  45. 二、 英文部分
  46. Bergquist, W.,& Heikkinen, H.(1990). Students` ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of Education,67(12),1000-1003.
  47. Boujaoude, Saouma.(1993) Systematic errors when solving Kinetic and chemical equilibrium problem, Science Teaching ERIC ED361196
  48. Cohen, G.(1983).The psychology of cognition. New York :Academic Press, Inc.
  49. Jonstone, A. H.,MacDonald, J. J., & Webb, G. (1977) Chemical equilibrium and its conceptual difficulties. Education in Chemistry,14(6),169-171.
  50. Vygotsky , L. S.(1962).Thought and language.Hanfmann, E. and Vaker, G. (Trans.).Cambridge, MA :M. I. T. Press.
Times Cited
  1. 林志成(2013)。線型函數的迷思概念與補救教學策略研究。淡江大學中等學校教師在職進修數學教學碩士學位班學位論文。2013。1-132。 
  2. 蔡月卿(2012)。電腦動畫在教學上的應用-以粒子觀點解釋平衡概念。臺灣師範大學化學系在職進修碩士班學位論文。2012。1-82。