Title

應用多屬性決策分析第三方物流敏捷供應商之評選

Translated Titles

An Application of Multiple Attribute Decision Marking on the Selection of Third-Party Logistics Agile Suppliers

Authors

劉士銘

Key Words

第三方物流 ; 模糊德爾菲 ; 詮釋結構模式 ; Herrera-Viedma’ Model ; 分析網路程序 ; VIKOR ; Third-Party Logistics ; Fuzzy Delphi Method ; Interpretive Structural Modeling ; Herrera-Viedma’ Model ; Analytical Network Process ; VIKOR

PublicationName

虎尾科技大學工業工程與管理研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2013年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

張洝源

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

物流活動串聯了企業整個生產經營過程,是企業賴以生存的基礎,在企業運用的競爭策略中,扮演舉足輕重的角色。專業的物流公司,擁有先進的物流技術,豐富的物流經驗,良好的通路關係,能夠為企業提供專業化的物流服務。由於規模經濟的因素,物流成本較低,這些都對企業產生相當大的吸引力。而在現今全球化的經濟潮流下,競爭愈來愈激烈,企業之敏捷力是指能夠快速辨識與把握市場機會的能力,然而在大環境不斷動盪下,產品生命週期逐漸縮短,許多企業為了提升自身競爭力與降低成本,紛紛將企業物流部份的流程委外。在供應鏈的體系下,透過第三方專業物流服務以及時、快速的方式,來完成產品的交付。 本研究主要目的在於探討在企業的物流委外策略中,以第三方物流的角度,藉由不同特性之物流資訊系統,對第三方物流敏捷度之影響程度來衡量對託貨者與收貨者之物流,期望藉由選擇敏捷之第三方物流,進而提升整體供應鏈物流之敏捷度。本研究考量如何選擇敏捷的第三方物流合作夥伴,經由文獻整理出相關敏捷度準則,共整理出四大構面及二十一項準則,並同時使用以下四種分析方法,分別為模糊德爾菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM)、詮釋結構模式(Interpretive Structural Modeling, ISM) 結合Herrera-Viedma’ Model發展成為分析網路程序(Analytical Network Process, ANP)以及VIKOR(VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje)程序。結合此四種方法於企業供應商之管理實務,期望能降低評選第三方物流的潛在風險,並提升企業營運效益。 本研究根據歷年之文獻整理出與第三方物流敏捷供應商之相關準則,共有四大構面二十一項準則,再經由研究個案公司進行適當準則的篩選,企業篩選結果為四大構面十八項準則,接著進行準則階層分析尋求在準則之間的架構於相互依賴與回饋性,並計算準則之相對權重,將企業內部對於與企業合作之第三方物流供應商進行敏捷度分析,為企業挑選出符合企業需求的最適第三方物流敏捷供應商。

English Abstract

Logistics activities link the entire management processes of enterprises, which lay the foundation that ensures the survival of enterprises and play a pivotal role as far as competitive corporate strategies are concerned. Professional logistics companies boast advanced logistics technology, rich experience in logistics, and good channeling, all of which enable them to provide professional logistics services. The economies of scale factor and lower logistics costs are quite appealing for enterprises. In today’s trend of the globalized economy and increasingly intense competition, enterprises’ agility refers to the ability to quickly identify and grasp market opportunities. However, with the ongoing turmoil at present, product life cycles have progressively become shortened, and many enterprises have outsourced their logistics processes in order to enhance their own competitiveness and reduce costs. Under the supply chain system, product deliveries are completed through third parties’ timely and fast professional logistic services. The purpose of this study is to explore the enterprises’ logistics outsourcing strategies. From the perspective of Third-Party Logistics (3PL) and the degree of impact the logistics information system with different characteristics has on 3PL agility, the logistics of consignors and recipients were measured, with hopes of choosing agile 3PL and enhancing the overall agility of the supply chain logistics. In this study, considerations were given to how to choose agile 3PL partners. The related agility criteria from the literatures were summarized into 4 main dimensions and 21 criteria. Meanwhile, four analysis methods below were adopted: Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) combined with Herrera-Viedma’ Model to develop into the Analytical Network Process (ANP) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje procedures (VIKOR). The four methods combined were used by enterprise suppliers in their management practices in order to reduce potential risks relating to 3PL selections and enhance the operational efficiency of the enterprises. Based on the literatures over the years, the criteria relating to 3PL agile suppliers were summarized, which consist of 4 main dimensions and 21 criteria. Then, through the study cases (companies), appropriate criteria were selected. The enterprises screened and selected the results to derive at 4 main dimensions and 18 criteria. Hierarchical analysis was then conducted to seek the interdependence and feedbacks between the criteria structures and calculate the relative weights of the criteria. Internal agility analysis on the 3PL suppliers that cooperated with the enterprises was conducted to choose the most appropriate 3PL agility suppliers that meet the enterprises’ needs.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 工業工程與管理研究所
工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 2. 林佩瑩、廖學誠 (2008),應用模糊德爾菲法分析高雄愛河綠廊功能之研究,臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告,第二十二卷第二期,89-106頁。
    連結:
  2. 4. 林俊宏、曾國雄、任維廉 (2005),利用 VIKOR 方法解決企業資源規劃系統評選問題,農業與經濟 (Agriculture and Economics),第三十四卷,69-90頁。
    連結:
  3. 9. 張寧、汪明生、陳耀明 (2008),以詮釋結構模式法探討直航對高雄總體發展影響之策略,管理學報,第二十五卷第六期,635-649頁。
    連結:
  4. 13. 陳妍方 (2008),敏捷供應鏈之適應性配送,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所,碩士論文。
    連結:
  5. 14. 陳志堅、唐麗英、王春和 (2007),應用因素分析與 VIKOR 方法構建多變量管制程序,品質學報,第一十四卷,第一期,57-67頁。
    連結:
  6. 16. 陳虹遐 (2004),應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估,國立成功大學工業設計研究所,碩士論文。
    連結:
  7. 22. 劉建浩、林榮禾、曾國雄 (2009),結合模糊積分與 VIKOR 模式評估航空公司服務品質,顧客滿意學刊,第五卷,第一期,175-199頁。
    連結:
  8. 23. 衛萬里、張文智 (2005),應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究,設計學報,第十卷,第三期,59-77頁。
    連結:
  9. 27. Abbasi, M., Iravani, M., Rajabi, M., and Jannesari, H. (2013), “A social work study on impact of gender, marital status and employment status on internet addiction”, Management Science Letters, Vol.3, No.3, pp.1019-1024.
    連結:
  10. 29. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., and Tiwari, M. K. (2007), “Modeling agility of supply chain”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.36, No.4, pp.443-457.
    連結:
  11. 33. Chang, A. Y., Hu, K. J., and Hong, Y. L. (2013), “An ISM-ANP approach to identifying key agile factors in launching a new product into mass production”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.51, No.2, pp.582-597.
    連結:
  12. 35. Christopher, M. (2000), “The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.29, No.1, pp.37-44.
    連結:
  13. 42. Gunasekaran, A. (1998), “Agile manufacturing: enablers and an implementation framework”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.36, No.5, pp.1223-1247.
    連結:
  14. 43. Gupta, R., Sachdeva, A., and Bhardwaj, A. (2010), “Selection of 3pl service provider using integrated fuzzy delphi and fuzzy TOPSIS”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol.2, pp.20-22.
    連結:
  15. 46. NASAB, H. H., BIOKI, T. A., and ZARE, H. K. (2012), “Finding a probabilistic approach to analyze lean manufacturing”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.29, pp.73-81.
    連結:
  16. 47. Hsu, Y. L., Lee, C. H., and Kreng, V.r B. (2010), “The application of fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.1, pp.419-425.
    連結:
  17. 48. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., and Mieno, H. (1993), “The Max-Min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.55, No.3, pp.241-253.
    連結:
  18. 49. Jharkharia, S., and Shankar, R. (2004), “IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.53, No.8, pp.700-712.
    連結:
  19. 50. Kidd, P. T. (1995a), “Agile manufacturing: a strategy for the 21st century”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.197, pp.1-6.
    連結:
  20. 51. Kidd, P. T., (1995b), Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
    連結:
  21. 52. Lee, J. W., and Kim, S. H. (2000), “Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection”, Computers & Operations Research, Vol.27, No.4, pp.367-382.
    連結:
  22. 53. Li, Y., and Zi, C. (2012), “Analysis of load factors based on interpretive structural model”, Journal of Computers, Vol.7, No.7, pp.1704-1711.
    連結:
  23. 55. Liou, J. J. H., and Chuang, Y. T. (2010), “Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.5, pp.3755-3761.
    連結:
  24. 57. Meade, L. M., and Sarkis, J. (1999), “Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.37, No.2, pp.241-261.
    連結:
  25. 60. Murry, J. W., and Hammons, J. O. (1995), “Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research”, Review of Higher Education, Vol.18, No.4, pp.423-436.
    連結:
  26. 63. Poloie, K., Fazli, S., Alvandi, M., and Hasanlo, S. (2012), “A framework for measuring the supply chain & quot; s agility of mass construction industry in Iran”, Management Science Letters, Vol.2, No.7, pp.2317-2334.
    連結:
  27. 64. Prahalad, and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Boston (MA).
    連結:
  28. 65. Rahman, M. N. A., Norlidah Alias, S. S., and DeWitt, D. (2013), “Textbook content transformation: Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach”, Life Science Journal, Vol.10, No.1, pp.1736-1745.
    連結:
  29. 66. Ravi, V., and Shankar, R. (2005), “Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.72, No.8, pp.1011-1029.
    連結:
  30. 68. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    連結:
  31. 69. Saaty, T. L. (1996a), The Analytic Network Process, RWS, Pittsburgh.
    連結:
  32. 71. Saaty, T. L., and Takizawa, M. (1986), “Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.26, No.2, pp.229-237.
    連結:
  33. 72. Sarkis, J. (2003), “Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—alternate considerations”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.86, No.1, pp.81-90.
    連結:
  34. 73. Sharifi, H., and Zhang, Z. (1999), “A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: an introduction”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.62, No.1, pp.7-22.
    連結:
  35. 74. Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., and Murthy, N. (2006), “The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol.24, No.2, pp.170-188.
    連結:
  36. 75. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., and Shankar, R. (2005), “Selection of third-party logistics (3PL): a hybrid approach using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP)”. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol.6, No.1, pp.32-46.
    連結:
  37. 76. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., and Shankar, R. (2006), “Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP)”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.56, No.1, pp.25-59.
    連結:
  38. 78. Tzeng, G. H., Lin, C. W., and Opricovic, S. (2005), “Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation”, Energy Policy, Vol.33, No.11, pp.1373-1383.
    連結:
  39. 79. Tzeng, G. H., Teng, M. H., Chen, J. J., and Opricovic, S. (2002), “Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol.21, No.2, pp.171-187.
    連結:
  40. 80. Wang, T. C., and Chen, Y. H. (2007), “Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection”, Omega, Vol.35, No.4, pp.384-388.
    連結:
  41. 81. Wang, T. C., and Chen, Y. H. (2008), “Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP”, Information Sciences, Vol.178, No.19, pp.3755-3765.
    連結:
  42. 82. Wang, Y. L., and Tzeng, G. H. (2012), “Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.39, No.5, pp.5600-5615.
    連結:
  43. 83. Warfield, J. N. (1976), Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity, Wiley interscience, World Scientific.
    連結:
  44. 89. Yu, P. L. (1973), “A class of solutions for group decision problems”, Management Science, Vol.19, No.8, pp.936-946.
    連結:
  45. 91. Zeleny, M., and Cochrane, J. L., 1982, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill New York.
    連結:
  46. 1. 林我聰 (2005),結合 ANP 及 DEMATEL 於供應商績效評估研究,國立政治大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。.
  47. 3. 林長廷 (2006),應用分析網路程序法於晶圓製造廠派工法則評估模式之探討,明新科技大學工程管理研究所,碩士論文。
  48. 5. 林俊岳 (2013),以逆物流效益評估模式建構太陽能產業供應鏈導入逆物流最佳方案之研究,國立中央大學企業管理學系,碩士論文。
  49. 6. 林家豪 (2003),營造廠現場管理人力配置之研究,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系,碩士論文。
  50. 7. 徐村和 (1998),模糊德菲層級分析法,模糊系統學刊,第四卷第一期, 59-72頁。
  51. 8. 張均漢 (2010),以網路分析法為基礎之敏捷功能點計算模式,德明財經科技大學資訊科技與管理研究所,碩士論文。
  52. 10. 梁世忠 (2003),數位相機產業之大量客製模式研究,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系,碩士論文。
  53. 11. 許迪威 (2003),建設公司BSC績效評估模式之研究-應用ANP/FUZZY法,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系,碩士論文。
  54. 12. 許淑瑜 (2001),企業資源規劃 (ERP) 系統評選之研究應用分析網路程序,淡江大學資訊管理學系,碩士論文。
  55. 15. 陳美芳 (2009),產品服務化系統應用於永續產品設計開發之策略研究-以辦公室電子電機設備為例,大葉大學設計研究所,碩士論文。
  56. 17. 黃雪晴 (2000),國內資訊電子業聯盟夥伴選擇模式之研究,國立成功大學工業管理學系,碩士論文。
  57. 18. 葉宗展 (2009),敏捷製造資訊系統評選機制之研究,國立勤益科技大學工業工程與管理系研究所,碩士論文。
  58. 19. 經濟部商業司(2008),台灣物流年鑑,工研院辨識與安全科技中心。
  59. 20. 廖錚圻 (2005),應用蟻群最佳化求解敏捷製造排程問題,國立台灣科技大學工業管理研究所,碩士論文。
  60. 21. 管倖生、高新發 (2006),設計研究方法,第二版,全華圖書,台北。
  61. 24. 鄭滄濱 (2001),軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系,碩士論文。
  62. 25. 賴建成 (2004),企業敏捷度績效評估方法,國立台灣清華大學工業工程與工業研究所,碩士論文。
  63. 26. 蘇雄義 (2000),物流與運籌管理,華泰書局,台北。
  64. 28. Adler, M., and Ziglio, E., (1996), Gazing Into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  65. 30. Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera‐Viedma, E., Alcala‐Fdez, J., and Porcel, C. (2008), “A consistency‐based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol.23, No.2, pp.155-175.
  66. 31. Baramichai, M. (2012), “Customizing supply chain using the agile Supply-Chain portfolio analysis”, http://hdl. handle. net/10527/10578,Vol.10527, pp.10578.
  67. 32. Bititci, U. S., Mendibil, K., Martinez, V., and Albores, P. (2005), “Measuring and managing performance in extended enterprises”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.25, No.4, pp.333-353.
  68. 34. Chen, C. (2012), “The application of interpretive structural modeling method to develop verity design solution of case host preference-based products: a case study of razor”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol.35, No.1, pp.92-99.
  69. 36. Costantino, N., and Pellegrino, R. (2010), “Evaluating risk in put-or-pay contracts: an application in waste management using fuzzy Delphi method”, Journal of Applied Operational Research, Vol.2, No.1, pp.62-70.
  70. 37. Demirel, N. C., and Yucenur, G. N. (2011), “The cruise port place selection problem with extended VIKOR and ANP methodologies under fuzzy environment”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol.2.
  71. 38. Goldman, S. L., and Nagel, R. N. (1993), “Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.8, pp.18-18.
  72. 39. Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., and Preiss, K., (1995), Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.
  73. 40. Goldman, S. L., Preiss, K., and Nagel, R. N., (1996), Cooperate to Compete: Building Agile Business Relationships, Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.
  74. 41. Gorvett, R., FRM, A., and Liu, N. (2006), “Interpretive structural modeling of interactive risks”, Enterprise Risk Management Symposium, Society of Actuaries, Chicago, IL, April. pp.23-26.
  75. 44. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., and Luque, M. (2004), “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations”, European journal of operational research, Vol.154, No.1, pp.98-109.
  76. 45. Hopp, W. J., and Spearman, M. L. (1996), Factory Physics: Foundation of Manufacturing Management, Chicago: Irwin.
  77. 54. Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M., (1975), The Delphi Method, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
  78. 56. Matwale, C. R., Datta, S., and Mahapatra, S. S. (2012), “Supply chain agility assessment module in fuzzy paradigm” , National Conference on " Recent Trends in Operations and Supply Chain Management"August - 04, 2012, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida.
  79. 58. Muckstadt, J. A., Murray, D. H., Rappold, J. A., and Collins, D. E. (2001), “Guidelines for collaborative supply chain system design and operation”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol.3, No.4, pp.427-453.
  80. 59. Murray, T. J., Pipino, L. L., and van Gigch, J. P. (1985), “A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi”, Human Systems Management, Vol.5, No.1, pp.76-80.
  81. 61. Nagal, R., and Dove, R. (1991), “21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy: an industry-led view”, Iacocca Institute, Lehigh University, Vol.1, pp.991.
  82. 62. Opricovic, S. (1998), “Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems”, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, Vol.2, No.1, pp.5-21.
  83. 67. Richards, C. W. (1996), “Agile manufacturing: beyond lean”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.37, pp.60-64.
  84. 70. Saaty, T. L. (1996b), Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS, Pittsburgh.
  85. 77. Tipmontian, J., Rao, K. S., and Rajmohan, M. (2012), “Selection of handling of route in postharvest supply chain using fuzzy Delphi method and dynamic programming”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol.8, No.8, pp.4207-4214.
  86. 84. Warfield, J. N. (1982), “Interpretive structural modeling”, Group Planning and Problem-Solving Methods in Engineering, New York: Wiley, pp.155-201.
  87. 85. Warfield, J. N., and Ayiku, M. N. B. (1989), “Sociotechnical modeling for developing nations”, SCIMA, Vol.18, pp.25-40.
  88. 86. Wu, K. Y. (2011), “Applying the fuzzy Delphi method to analyze the evaluation indexes for service quality after railway Re-Opening–Using the old mountain line railway as an example”, Proceedings of the 15th WSEAS international conference on Systems. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS). pp.474-479.
  89. 87. Wu, P. J., Feng, C. M., and Chen, Y. F. (2012), “Adaptable distribution management for agile supply chains”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol.6, No.5, pp.1863-1871.
  90. 88. Youssef, M. A. (1992), “Agile manufacturing: a necessary condition for competing in global markets”, Industrial Engineering, Vol.24, No.12, pp.18-20.
  91. 90. Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., and Gunasekaran, A. (1999), “Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes”, International Journal of production economics, Vol.62, No.1, pp.33-43.
Times Cited
  1. 楊子豪(2014)。供應鏈長鞭效應、敏捷力與績效關聯性之研究。虎尾科技大學工業工程與管理研究所學位論文。2014。1-122。 
  2. 卓政憲(2018)。因應長鞭效應之關鍵供應鏈敏捷力。虎尾科技大學工業管理系工業工程與管理碩士班學位論文。2018。1-101。