健身運動參與者知覺自主支持、運動行為調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖之研究

The Research of Exercise Participants in Perceived Autonomy Support, Behavior Regulation in Exercise, Flow Experience and Behavior Intention

黃虹毓(Hung-Yu Huang)

指導教授 ： 柳立偉

朝陽科技大學/管理學院/休閒事業管理系/碩士(2014年)

摘要

本研究旨在探討臺北市健身運動參與者知覺自主支持、運動行調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖之關係，並探討不同人口統計變項之健身運動參與者在知覺自主支持、運動行為調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖之差異情形。以臺北市運動中心與健身房之健身運動參與者為研究對象，研究母體總數為600人。本研究採取分層比例抽樣方式，共計發放600份問卷，回收560份，扣除填答不完全者等無效問卷18份，有效問卷共計542份，有效回收率為90.33%。統計分析方式包含描述性統計分析、項目分析、信度分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析及結構方程模式，研究結果如下：一、性別在流暢體驗上部分達顯著差異；二、年齡在知覺自主支持、運動行為調節部分達顯著差異；三、學歷在知覺自主支持、運動行為調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖部分達顯著差異；四、職業在運動行為調節部分達顯著差異；五、個人月收入在運動行為調節、流暢體驗、行為意圖部分達顯著差異；六、選擇地點在運動行為調節、流暢體驗部分達顯著差異；七、參與種類在知覺自主支持、運動行為調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖部分達顯著差異；八、知覺自主支持會顯著影響運動行為調節、流暢體驗與行為意圖；九、運動行為調節會顯著影響流暢體驗與行為意圖；十、流暢體驗顯著影響行為意圖。

關鍵字

流暢體驗 ； 運動行為調節 ； 知覺自主支持 ； 健身運動 ； 行為意圖

並列摘要

This study focus on the relationship among perceived autonomy support, behavior regulation in exercise, flow experience and behavior intention of exercisers. Subjects were 600 exercise participants of sports center and fitness center in Taipei city. Researcher send out 600 questionnaires and 560 questionnaires were collected, therefore 18 questionnaires invalid which respondents incomplete. There were 542 valid questionnaires and valid response rate of 90.33%. The statistical analysis methods in this study consist descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance and structure equation model. The results were as follows: 1. Gender and flow experience were shown apart to be significantly different. 2. Age shown significant different was covered between perceived autonomy support and behavior regulation in exercise. 3. Educational level shown significant different was covered between perceived autonomy support, behavior regulation in exercise, flow experience and behavior intention. 4. Occupation and behavior regulation in exercise were shown apart to be significantly different. 5. Income shown significant different was covered between behavior regulation in exercise, flow experience and behavior intention. 6. Select location significant different was covered between behavior regulation in exercise and flow experience. 7. Participation species shown significant different was covered between perceived autonomy support, behavior regulation in exercise, flow experience and behavior intention. 8. Perceived autonomy support has positive effect and significantly relationship on behavior regulation in exercise, flow experience and behavior intention. 9. Behavior regulation in exercise has positive effect and significantly relationship on flow experience and behavior intention. 10. Flow experience has positive effect and significantly relationship on behavior intention.

並列關鍵字

Behavior regulation in exercise ； Perceived autonomy support ； Exercise ； Flow experience ； Behavior intention

參考文獻

王成財、陳金足、王小龍（2000）。大學生參與休閒活動之行為意圖研究。萬能學報，32，279-292。

江民瑜（2013）。學業情緒為中介的自我調整學習模式之檢驗：以數學領域為例。當代教育研究季刊，21（3），113-150。

行政院體育委員會（2012）。中華民國101年運動統計。臺北市：行政院體育委員會。

李明儒、 郭家瑜（2011）。 探討參與帆船運動者的參與動機、活動涉入及流暢體驗之研究。 運動休閒餐旅研究，6（1），95-109。

李柏慧、劉淑燕（2005）。針對民眾從事健走行為意圖之研究。大專體育學刊，7（1），147-156。