透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.59.187
  • 期刊

論行政契約上之單方變更權-以德、法法制之比較爲中心

The Power of Unilateral Modification on Administrative Contract: Based on the Comparison of German and French Legal System

摘要


行政契約法長期爲我國法制所忽略,固然與其法律救濟途徑之結構有直接密切之關係;但更深遠地說,實是我國行政法深受德國法制影響所致。 德、法兩國行政契約法之主要差異,粗略而言,即在於德國法上之行政契約仍然強調當事人間“地位平等”的私法契約觀,而法國之行政契約法自始即以行政機關基於公共利益之實現而享有優勢地位,作爲行政契約不同於私法契約的主要特徵。基此,德國行政契約法側重人民權利之保護面向,而法國法則著重行政契約的工具性效能。 我國行政程序法之制定,原以德國行政程序法爲主要範本;其中有關行政契約的部分,尤其與德國行政程序法之相關規定十分接近。惟學者研擬本法草案之際,特別將法國行政契約法上強調行政權優勢的精神納入考量;進而將此特色植入本法相關條文之中。其中第一百四十六條有關行政機關單方變更權的規定,即同時兼具法、德兩國法制之特色:一方面強調行政權所代表的公益性,另一方面亦不忘締約人民的權利保護。本文即以在常態情況下,行政機關所享有之單方變更權爲出發點,一方面探究單方變更權在行政契約法上的制度設計與其理論基礎;另一方面則討論其實際運用的可能領域及其適用原則。

並列摘要


Administrative contract law, in our legal system, is neglected for a long time, due to the special system of its contentious proceedings undoubtedly. However, the real reason is that our administrative contract law is deeply influenced by the German contract law. The main difference between the German and the French administrative contract law, roughly speaking, is the fact that the German administrative contract still puts great emphasis on equality between two parties; and yet the French public law gives the administrative authority more privileges because of public interest. Therefore, German law places importance on protection of the people's rights; while the French law emphasis on the instrumental efficiency of the administrative contract. The Administrative Procedure Act of ROC is very similar to the Germany's Administrative Procedure Act. But the scholars, who drew up the draft, put the spirit of French administrative contract law into our Administrative Procedure Act. Article 146, about the power of unilateral modification, is united the characteristic of German and French law. On one hand, it emphasizes on public interest that the administrative authority represents for; on the other hand, it never forgets the protection of people's rights. This article sets out from the power of unilateral modification in the normal condition. We study the institutional design and theoretical foundation of the right of unilateral modification; and discuss the field of application and the principle of putting it into practice.

參考文獻


吳庚(1978)。行政契約之基本問題。台大法學論叢。7(2),133。
吳庚(2003)。行政法之理論與實用
吳秦雯(2001)。行政契約之效力與履行-法國法制爲中心。政大法研所。
吳秦雯(2002)。行政機關於行政契約履行階段之「權力」-以法國法制爲中心評析我國現行行政程序法之規定。台灣本土法學。41,77。
李建良(2002)。行政契約與新行政法。元照出版公司。

被引用紀錄


楊貴甯(2009)。行政契約法制在我國地方自治團體間跨域自治事務合作運用之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200900082
蕭百慶(2015)。政府採購法第93條共同供應契約之研究:以契約類型與定性為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.01052
陳怡秀(2014)。政府控制企業於國際投資法及投資仲裁中所涉之法律問題〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02110
楊博全(2013)。論我國行政契約法制之發展〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.11065
郭躍民(2004)。全民健康保險特約醫事服務機構合約(特約醫院及診所)之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2004.01151

延伸閱讀