訴訟標的價額核定之研究

陳亭禎

44.201.94.72，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Law > Department of Law
Social Sciences > Law

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

There is no full-text available at the moment. Airiti would like to request author's authorization. I would like to provide authorization.

訴訟標的價額核定之研究

A Study on Determination concerning the Value of a Claim

陳亭禎 , Masters　　Advisor：吳從周　　

繁體中文

訴訟標的價額；核定；有償主義；訴訟費用；裁判費；財產權；非財產權；交易價額；原告就訴訟標的所有之利益；不能核定；數項標的互相競合；數項標的應為選擇；附帶請求； the value of claim ； determination ； non-gratuitous principle ； litigation expenses ； court costs ； proprietary rights ； non-proprietary rights ； transaction value ； the interests in the claim as owned by the plaintiff ； unable to determine ； multiple claims are of the same economic purpose ； multiple claims are asserted alternatively ； incidental claims

Abstract │ Reference (75) │ Times Cited (1) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

The procedure of civil litigation adopts non-gratuitous principle, and the litigation expenses are borne by the parties with purposes to prevent abuse of litigation by people and conserve expenses from the National Treasury, etc. Taxation amount of a court cost is accounted based on the value of a claim, which similarly affects the applicable proceeding on civil litigation in the initiative action, the right of appeal to the court of third instance, and the court’s declaration of a provisional execution on its own initiative, etc. Its determination plays an important role in protecting rights and interests of the parties. This article attempts to compile doctrines on the individual issues regarding the determination of the value of claim, in both existing theories and practices, coming with analysis and induction in order to sketch the general concept of the system. Lastly, supporting legislations from Germany and Japan based on the theory. The coverage of research is subject to regulations of Code of Civil Procedure, although many of the regulations apply mutatis mutandis to family cases, family cases will not be mentioned for the length of this article.
    About the content, this article starts from the origin of gratuitous and non-gratuitous principles, continues with historical development of litigation expenses regulations, and illustrates definition and scope of civil litigation expenses. Taxation amount of court cost involves its attribute in matters arising from proprietary or non-proprietary rights, as a result, an early introduction of distinguishing criteria for legislations in Germany and Japan, theories and practices of our nation in matters arising from proprietary and non-proprietary rights is needed, then perspectives included in this article. For a more complete concept structure on determination of the value of claim, this article cuts from basic concepts, and comes with explanations in order of theory reference, benefits of determination, determination organs, standards of determination such as time, place and principle. As for determination criteria of the value of claim, this article introduces it as special topic. In accordance with regulations on the claims’ values determination subject to Code of Civil Procedure, this article begins with introduction of supplementary principles (the transaction value of a claim, the interests in the claim as owned by the plaintiff) and general rules (unable to determine), coming with Articles 77-4 to 77-11, also respective review on their applicable scopes and related issues. Also, in case of action with multiple claims, the article correspondently combines concept of claim with the claim in court costs law to explain the determination in some combinations, particularly in the subject of a number of “same economic purpose” or “are asserted alternatively” and “incidental claims” as a key explanation of the concept. Moreover, the accounting of court cost is on basis of the value of claim, its taxation and accounting shall be altogether introduced. Lastly, controversies occur at the difference in determination standards caused by different perspectives on the judgment of “the interests in the claim as owned by the plaintiff”, to prevent such situation, this article raises three cases happening in our nation concerning controversies on the claim’s value determination and action traits, and discuss in order of annulment of resolutions adopted in a shareholders’ meeting, official apology post on the newspaper, and revocation of the arbitral award, with developments and evolving opinion in practices.
    Determination of the claim’s value, regarding development of civil litigation expenses law in our nation, due to negligence on construction of this territory over a long period of time, usually lack references when coming to actual determination of the value of a claim, thus resorting to judgment as individual case. We expect this article to provide a direction in actual claim’s value determination by constructing a rough structure of litigation expenses system and organization of related information.

Reference ( 75 ) 〈TOP〉

2. 王澤鑑，法律思維與民法實例─請求權基礎理論體系，三民，2011年8月。
連結：
6. 吳從周，以一訴主張數項標的之價額計算─兼評最高法院九六年度台抗字第六七七號裁定，台灣法學第164期，2010年11月，頁45-60。
連結：
8. 吳從周、陳亭禎，請求登報道歉回復名譽之訴訟標的價額計算─簡評最高法院九十八年台抗字第一○二號裁定，月旦裁判時報第6期，2010年12月，頁63-69。
連結：
14.陳計男，訴之重疊的合併與選擇的合併─試評釋最高法院七十一年度台上字第二三八八號判決，法令月刊第三十七卷第六期，1986年6月，頁11-13。
連結：
1. Münchener Kommentar, ZPO, 3.Aufl., 2008, Bd. 1.
連結：

Times Cited (1) 〈TOP〉

林兆薇(2015)。民事簡易訴訟程序之研究—以事件類型與救濟為中心。臺北大學法律學系一般生組學位論文。2015。1-183。

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：