《崇禎曆書》考

On the Calendrical Studies of the Chongzhen Reign (Chongzhen lishu)

祝平一(Ping-Yi Chu)

《明代研究》 11期 (2008/12) Pp. 133-161

https://doi.org/10.29971/JMS.200812.0005

摘要

本文從前人未曾研究的韓國首爾大學奎章閣所藏之《崇禎曆書》板本，重新考察《崇禎曆書》的內容。本文的新發現爲確定《曆引》乃《崇禎曆書》所原有，至於《遠鏡說》、《測食》與《渾天儀說》則可能亦是《崇禎曆書》的一部份。本文並詳細比較《崇禎曆書》與《西洋新法曆書》的封面頁，以理解入清之後湯若望(1591-1666)的改板方式與纂修的人事變遷。

關鍵字

崇禎曆書 ； 西洋新法算書

並列摘要

Based on the Kyujangga edition of the Calendrical Studies of the Chongzhen Reign housed in the Seoul National University, this paper investigates the contents of the Calendrical Studies of the Chongzhen Reign. It also compares the front materials of the Calendrical Studies of the Chongzhen Reign and Xiyang xinfalishu (Calendrical Treatises in Accordance with the New Western Methods) in order to understand how Adam Schall von Bell manipulated the front materials to associate the calendrical reform with Christianity. The differences of the front materials in these two collactaneas indicate how the form of a book changes its meaning to the reader.

並列關鍵字

Chongzhen Reign Chongzhen lishu ； Xiyang xinfalishu Calendrical Treatises in Accordance with the New Western Methods

參考文獻

明徐光啟、湯若望修輯(2000)。故宮珍本叢刊：西洋新法曆書。海口:海南出版社。

潘鼐、薄樹人編(1993)。中國科學技術典籍通業。鄭州:河南教育出版社。

李國慶(1998)。明代刊工姓名索引。上海:上海古籍出版社。

D.F. McKenzie(1999).Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts.Cambridge, U.K. New York:Cambridge University Press.