透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.40.47
  • 期刊

控制股東的股權偏離程度與公司績效:持股率與類別的調節效果

Controlling Shareholder's Separation of Share Rights and Firm Performance: The Role of Shareholding Ratio and Type

摘要


過去研究指出控制股東的股份控制權通常大過於盈餘分配權,且當股份控制權與盈餘分配權偏離程度越大時,代理問題會更嚴重。因此本研究第一項研究目的係探討控制股東的股份控制權與盈餘分配權偏離程度對於公司績效的影響性。除此之外,文獻也提到控制股東的持股率會影響股權偏離程度的代理問題,因此本研究第二項研究目的係探討控制股東的持股率對於偏離程度對公司績效影響性的調節效果。再者,文獻也提出控制股東類別會影響股權偏離程度對於公司績效的影響效果。因此本研究第三項研究目的係探討控制股東的類別是否會改變偏離程度與持股率對於公司績效的影響性。本文以2009 年至2013 年的上市櫃公司為研究樣本,本文實證結果發現:控制股東的股權偏離程度對於公司績效存在負向影響。除此之外,控制股東的持股率及單一家族主導對於前述的負向影響具有調節效果。本文實證結果可以補充文獻的不足,並作為上市櫃公司建構公司治理機制參考之用。

並列摘要


Prior literature asserted that the control rights of controlling shareholders are often larger than cash flow rights of them, and while the control-cash flow right deviation of controlling shareholders is larger, the agency problem will be seriously. Therefore, the first research purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between the control-cash flow right deviation of controlling shareholders and the firm's performance. In addition, previous studies also pointed out the ownership of controlling shareholders has the moderating effects on the above relationship. Then, the next purpose of this work is to examine whether the ownership of controlling shareholders has the moderating effects on the above relationship. Moreover, related literature suggested the type of controlling shareholders also influence the effect of control-cash flow right deviation on firm's performance; therefore, the third purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the type of controlling shareholders will change the effect of control-cash flow right deviation and ownership on firm's performance. Using firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange and Taipei exchange from 2009 to 2013 as the sample, the empirical results show that the relationship between the control-cash flow right deviation of controlling shareholders and the firm's performance is negative. In addition, the ownership of controlling shareholders and the single family control both have the moderating effects on the above negative relationship. The results of this study complement the existing literature and serve as reference for companies trying to build corporate governance mechanism.

參考文獻


林嬋娟與張哲嘉,2009,董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性,會計評論,第 48 期:1-33。(Lin, Chan-Jane, and Che-Chia Chang. 2009. Abnormal change of board members, family firms and fraud. The International Journal of Accounting Studies 48: 1-33.)
林穎芬、洪晨桓與陳羽甄,2011,家族與非家族企業之總經理替換與相對績效的關聯以台灣上市公司為例,管理評論,第 30 卷,第 3 期:25-47。(Lin, Ying-Fen, Chen-Huan Hong, and Yu-Zhen Chen. 2011. The relationship between managerial successions of family-controlled and non-family-controlled businesses and relative Performances: An empirical study of Taiwan listed companies. Management Review 30 (3): 25-47.)
林穎芬與劉維琪,2003,從高階主管薪酬的研究探討代理理論在台灣的適用程度,管理學報,第 22 卷,第 2 期:365-395。(Lin, Ying-Fen, and Victor Wei-Chi Liu. 2003. On the implementation of agency theory in Taiwan: A study of CEO compensation. Journal of Management 22 (2): 365-395.)
許美滿、吳壽山、鍾惠民與林怡群,2004,控制股東代理問題對公司價值之影響與舉債之監督效果分析,會計與公司治理,第 1 卷,第 2 期:67-90。(Hseu, Mei-Maun, Sou-Shan Wu, Huimin Chung, and Yi Qun Lin. 2004. Ownership structure, firm value and monitoring effects of debts: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance 1 (2): 67-90.)
陳麗如、彭金隆與王儷玲,2010,台灣保險業公司治理結構對風險決策行為的影響,管理評論,第 29 卷,第 4 期:1-18。(Chen, Lih Ru, Jin Lung Peng, and Jennifer L. Wang. 2010. The impacts of corporate governance structures on risk taking by insurance companies in Taiwan. Management Review 29 (4): 1-18.)

延伸閱讀