不同目標設定與類型對目標承諾與集體效能之影響

The Impact of Differences Goal-Setting and Goal Type on Goal Commitment and Collective Efficacy

蔡守浦(Shou-Pu Tsai) ； 張志成(Chiu-Cheng Chang) ； 黃宏春(Hong-Chun Huang)

《大專體育學術專刊》 91年度 (上) (2002/05) Pp. 260-270

https://doi.org/10.6695/AUES.200205_91.0026

摘要

本研究主要在探討不同目標設定與類型對目標承諾與集體效能之影響。研究對象是以參加木球擊球後，依成績百分等級篩選出共160位受試者，並隨機平均分配於「累加－合作目標」、「累加－支持目標」、「合作－合作目標」、「合作－支持目標」等四組中，並以獨立樣本二因子多變量分析，考驗受試者目標承諾與集體效能上之差異。經資料分析顯示：在目標承諾方面，「合作」目標設定高於「累加」目標設定，且「共同」目標類型高於「分配」目標類型；在集體效能方面，「累加」目標設定高於「合作」目標設定，且「共同」目標類型高於「分配」目標類型。

關鍵字

目標設定 ； 目標承諾 ； 集體效能

並列摘要

This study was to explore that different goal-setting and goal type impacted on goal commitment and collective efficacy. After the subjects joined wood ball striking, 160 participants were assigned by grade four situations: accumulation-cooperation goal, accumulation-assign goal, cooperative-cooperative goal, and cooperative-assign goal. We use analysis of two-way MAVOVA to test the difference of goal commitment and collective efficacy on subjects. The data analysis showed the following results: on goal commitment, ”cooperative” goal-setting was higher than ”accumulation” goal-setting, and ”cooperative” goal type was higher than distribution goal type on collective efficacy, ”accumulation” goal-setting was higher than ”cooperative” goal-setting, and ”cooperative” goal type was higher than distribution goal type.

並列關鍵字

goal-setting ； goal commitment ； collective efficacy