本研究從桌球選手不同握拍法技戰術表現來做探討,分析不同握拍法技戰術表現之差異。以2013~2016年間參加世界桌球錦標賽、中國公開賽之不同握拍法10位選手為研究對象,取其中直拍橫打、橫拍打法各五名,紀錄單打賽事共計47局。採用觀察研究法進行各項技術登錄,整理各統計表和量表所得原始資料後,以SPSS 統計軟體進行統計分析,得到結果及發現: 一、不管是直拍橫打或橫拍的選手之發球搶攻段、接發球搶攻段和相持球三段技術都是一樣的重要評估手段。 二、從不同握拍法之三段技術分析得知,在發球搶攻段,橫拍選手的得分率為70.9%,直拍橫打選手的得分率為55.43%,橫拍選手的發球搶攻段得分率精準性高於直拍橫打選手;接發球搶攻段得分率及使用率上,直拍橫打與橫拍均達良好和及格指標;在相持段得分率上直拍橫打選手優於橫拍選手,直拍橫打選手與橫拍選手在使用率上均未達及格指標。 三、不同握拍方式與三段技術之得分率及使用率無呈現顯著差異。 四、比賽勝負與三段技術呈現無顯著差異。
In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the players who had different grips and attended the World Snooker Championship and China Open from 2013 to 2016 to study. the author selected 5 game each of the matches in which the players used penhold backhand and shakehand, and recorded the singles of 47 innings within 10 games. the author used observational study methods for the technical login, and then organized various tables and the raw data. Later, the author used the SPSS statistical program for statistical analysis. The results could be obtained and found as below. 1. No matter what the players chose to use penhold backhand or shakehand, the stage in serving the ball to attack, in receiving the serve to attack and the stalemate segment are all the same important assessment techniques. 2. According to the analysis of three-stage technicals from different grips, it showed us that the scoring rate was 70.9% for the handshakers, while for the penhold backhand players, 55.43%. The accurancy of the handshakers is highner than the penhold backhand players'. The scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact was good. On the stalemate segment, the scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact didn't reach targets. The penhold backhand players performed better than shakehanders on scoring rate. 3. It showed no significant differences between the scoring rate and usage rate of three-stage technicals in which the players performed with different different grips . 4. It showed no significant differences between the win-lose situation and three-stage technicals.