Title

本土體育運動學術的發展趨勢分析:以1979-2013《體育學報》為例

Translated Titles

An Analysis of Physical Education and Sports Discipline Development Trend of "Physical Education Journal" from 1979 to 2013

DOI

10.6222/pej.4703.201409.1001

Authors

徐振德(Chem-Te Hsu);林聯喜(Lien-His Lin);戴玉林(Yu-Lin Tai);蔡清華(Ching-Hwa Tsai)

Key Words

內容分析 ; 科技部體育學門 ; 學科領域 ; content analysis ; physical education discipline of the Ministry of Science and Technology ; academic research fields

PublicationName

體育學報

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

47卷3期(2014 / 09 / 01)

Page #

325 - 337

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

目的:專業期刊可反映學術領域的興趣與時代思潮,以現今的國際趨勢而言,不同領域的學術期刊均定期回顧其發展趨勢,因此本研究以《體育學報》為對象,分析該期刊從1979至2013共35年間的所有文章,期能透過統整性的回顧研究觀察我國體育運動學術發展的脈動。方法:本研究採內容分析法探討體育運動學術發展趨勢,並透過百分比一致性公式檢驗內容分析的信度。結果:研究成果呈現近35年本土體育運動學術的發展趨勢,在學科分化後,各次領域均有不同的發展途徑。以整體性來說,自然科學類與人文社會科學類逐漸呈現將近6:4的比例產出論文,女性參與、多人發表成為近年的趨勢。結論:透過分析結果,本研究認為未來應相對關注發展體育運動學術中較居弱勢的學科領域,並更鼓勵女性發表論文;由於此類研究是相當重要的基礎學術工程,建議後續可朝分析多本期刊並進行國際比較的方向繼續研究。

English Abstract

Purpose: Professional journal is one of the ways to communicate with studies and practices, which enables to reflect academic interests and trends of the time. From the perspectives of international trends, journals can grow through content analysis oriented in researches. This study analyzed Physical Education Journal from 1979 to 2013, and hope recalled years of academic focus in Physical Education researches in Taiwan. Methods: This study used content analysis to analyze physical education and sports discipline development trend, and examine the reliability of content analysis through the percent agreement formula. Results: The findings both revealed the development trends and depicted the beating of sub-disciplines of sport studies. The ratio between Natural sciences and humanities & social sciences gradually showing nearly 6:4. Overall, it become a trend in Female participation and co-published in recent years. Conclusion: This study showed the research trend of physical education in the past thirty years. By the results of this study should be relatively concerned about the future development of the weaker disciplines and to encourage more female publish their research. Analyzed the trends of physical education research fields is a very important fundamental research, it is recommended that a follow-up study should including more journals and proceeding international comparability.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 體育學
Reference
  1. 呂宛蓁 (2005)。體育運動期刊中運動管理學文章之內容分析。中華體育季刊,19(1),101-109。
    連結:
  2. 吳萬福 (1980)。我國大專院校體育學術研究的趨勢與未來努力的方向。體育學報,2,67-76。
    連結:
  3. 卓俊伶 (2011)。體育與運動科學研究現況的批判與省思。體育學報,44(3),315-332。
    連結:
  4. 林晏州、林寶秀 (2006)。「戶外遊憩研究」期刊之研究趨勢分析。戶外遊憩研究,19(2),1-31。
    連結:
  5. 施致平、張琪、倪瑛蓮 (2012)。運動管理學:臺灣之研究現況與趨勢分析。體育學報,45(3),167-178。doi: 10.6222/pej.4503.201209.0701
    連結:
  6. 洪聰敏、黃毅志 (2009)。國內體育學術期刊之評比。大專體育學刊,11(1),1-15。
    連結:
  7. 許秀桃 (2012)。臺灣身體文化研究趨勢與學術生產力分析。身體文化學報,15,75-93。
    連結:
  8. 陳國光 (2002)。我國體育運動管理學期刊論文研究之趨勢探討:以體育學報為例。臺灣體育運動管理學報,1,93-104。
    連結:
  9. 陳閔祺、蘇維杉 (2011)。運動管理學研究議題與發展趨勢分析。運動休閒管理學報,8(1),111-126。
    連結:
  10. 張育愷、洪聰敏 (2014) 臺灣運動與體育領域學術期刊論文發表之現況分析。體育學報,47(1),1-9。
    連結:
  11. 葉寶玲、陳秉華、陳盈君、蔡毅樺 (2010)。《教育心理學報》四十年 (1967-2007) 之內容分析。教育心理學報,41(3),685-702。
    連結:
  12. 廖清海、連振杰、蔡靜汶 (2008)。2002 至2006年體育學報論文引用文獻計量分析。體育學報,41(1),85-98。
    連結:
  13. Bauer, M. W. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching-with text, image, and sound (pp. 131-151). London: Sage.
    連結:
  14. Buboltz, W. C., Jr., & Savickas, M. L. (1994). A 20-year retrospective of the Career Development Quarterly. Career Development Quarterly, 42(4), 367-381.
    連結:
  15. Chatoupis, C., & Vagenas, G. (2011). An analysis of published process-product research on physical education teaching methods. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 23(1), 271-289.
    連結:
  16. Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based Learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354-370.
    連結:
  17. Jones, S. J., Fong, C. J., Torres, L. G., Yoo, J. H., Decker, M. L., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Productivity in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.001
    連結:
  18. Mitchell, A. W., & McConnell Iii, J. R. (2012). A historical review of Contemporary Educational Psychology from 1995 to 2010. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(2), 136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.11.001
    連結:
  19. Powers, T. L., Swan, J. E., Bos, T., & Patton, J. F. (1998). Career research productivity patterns of marketing academicians. Journal of Business Research, 42(1), 75-86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963 (97)00099-4
    連結:
  20. Quatman, C., & Chelladurai, P. (2008). The social construction of knowledge in the field of sport management: A social network perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 651-676.
    連結:
  21. Smith, M. C., Locke, S. G., Boisse, S. J., Gallagher, P. A., Krengel, L. E., Kuczek, J. E., …Wertheim, C. (1998). Productivity of educational psychologists in Educational Psychology Journals, 1991-1996. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 173-181. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0961
    連結:
  22. Smith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, R. N., Arnold, C. S., Jackson, A., Johnson, L. S., … Smith, T. J. (2003). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997-2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 422-430. doi: 10.1016/s0361-476x (02) 00044-9
    連結:
  23. SmThomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2005). Research methods in physical activity (5th ed.). Champaogn, IL: Human Kinetics.ith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, R. N., Arnold, C. S., Jackson, A., Johnson, L. S., … Smith, T. J. (2003). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997-2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 422-430. doi: 0.1016/s0361-476x (02) 00044-9
    連結:
  24. Tsai, C. -C., & Wen, M. L. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000243727
    連結:
  25. Ward, P., & Ko, B. (2006). Publication trends in the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education from 1981 to 2005. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(3),266-280.Tsai, C. -C., & Wen, M. L. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000243727
    連結:
  26. Worthington, R. L., Soth-McNett, A. M., & Moreno, M. V. (2007). Multicultural counseling competencies research: A 20-year content analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(4), 351-361.
    連結:
  27. 王振寰、宋麗玉、張卿卿 (2006)。社會學門 (社會學、社會福利與工作、傳播學) 國際學術期刊與國內期刊評比研究執行成果與檢討。人文與社會科學簡訊,8(1),64-73。
  28. 林燕青、林靜雯 (2010)。2004-2008 年科學教育研究與發展季刊內容分析。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56,1-28。
  29. 徐元民、龍炳峰、文多斌 (2010)。學校體育學術研究-理論與實際結合。載於國立教育資料館 (主編),我國學校體育現況與展望(頁546-651)。臺北市:國立教育資料館。
  30. 邱金松 (1997)。體育學門之規劃研究 (計畫編號:NSC86-2418-H-179-001)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
  31. 許秀桃、徐振德 (2012)。學術生產力排名產生方法。(發明專利申請編號第101127256號)。臺北市:經濟部智慧財產局。
  32. 教育部體育署 (2013)。100 學年度學校體育統計年報。臺北市:教育部體育署。
  33. Kulinna, P., Scrabis-Fletcher, K., Kodish, S., Phillips, S. R., & Silverman, S. (2009). A decade of research literature in physical education pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28(2), 119-140.
Times Cited
  1. 張簡旭芳、相子元(2016)。運動表現之研究趨勢。運動表現期刊,3(2),49-54。
  2. 徐茂洲(2016)。體育領域應用偏最小平方法之現況。大專體育,136,55-65。
  3. 許齡之、許建民(2017)。臺灣體育運動期刊內容分析-以《體育學報》和《大專體育學刊》為例。臺灣體育學術研究,63,1-23。
  4. 黃郁婷、湯添進、陳昱文(2017)。運動社會學的發展脈絡、理論與主流議題。體育學報,50(1),1-18。
  5. 黃郁婷、湯添進、陳昱文、李炳昭(2016)。運動社會學研究議題分類與指標建構。體育學報,49(3),353-370。