透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.154.151
  • 期刊

DO FAMILY FIRMS IN TAIWAN CREATE VALUE AFTER ENDOGENEITY IS CONTROLLED?

摘要


Whether family firms create value is not conclusive, and most models treat a firm's type as exogenous. We find that whether a firm is family or non-family should be modeled as endogenous by using Hausman test and Heckman's (1979) two-step method. After controlling for the endogeneity, we find that family firms in Taiwan create value. Furthermore, we observe some firms switched their types from family to non-family or the other way around. We find that the switch should also be considered as endogenous, and the switches create value.

參考文獻


Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1329. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57, 2741–2772. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00511
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00049.x
Cronqvist, H., & Nilsson, M. (2003). Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 695-719. doi:10.2307/4126740

延伸閱讀