Title

農業總要素生產力成長因素之跨國研究--以中南美洲國家為例

Translated Titles

Agricultural Growth in Central America: A Cross-Country Study of the Determinants of TFP Growth

DOI

10.6342/NTU.2009.00028

Authors

巴尤克

Key Words

Agricultural TFP growth ; Malmquist index ; Determinants of Productivity Growth ; Agricultural TFP growth ; Malmquist index ; Determinants of Productivity Growth

PublicationName

臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2009年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

陸怡蕙

Content Language

英文

Chinese Abstract

ABSTRACT This study comprehends two phases for the analysis of agricultural Total Factor Productivity (TFP), its sources and determinants in Central America. In the first phase, DEA Malmquist TFP Index measures are calculated using FAO panel data to build a time trend that will help us to assess the behavior of agricultural TFP and its components during 1961 to 2005. The second phase uses econometric analysis to characterize the agricultural TFP time trends built in the first phase, by regressing the Malmquist index and its technical change component with determinants of agricultural productivity. The explanatory variables include fixed capital formation, human capital, international spillovers, irrigation infrastructure, environmental shocks and foreign aid. The efficiency change component of TFP change was not included since most of the results did not report much technical efficiency change for the exception of Honduras. Agricultural productivity studies have been justified by associating agricultural development with poverty reduction since the majority of the poor population inhabit rural areas and rely on agricultural activities as their main source of livelihoods. It is clear that production increases if more inputs are used or if productivity is improved, the higher conversion of forest land to agricultural uses and the increased needs to secure food. This makes an imperative for a sustainable increase of production by means of productivity growth rather than increasing land area. In the first phase we find four distinctive growth patters of TFP in CA. A steep increasing TFP growth pattern with non detrimental technical efficiency change (Belize and Costa Rica), a gradual TFP growth with non detrimental technical efficiency change (El Salvador and Guatemala), a humble TFP growth with detrimental technical efficiency change (Honduras and Panama) and detrimental TFP growth with non detrimental technical efficiency change (Nicaragua). An important aspect to add is that the main engine that drives agricultural TFP growth is technological change, therefore, if a country fails to update its technology compared to the other countries would not exhibit any improvements in TFP as seen in the case of Nicaragua. The possible error caused by multicollinearity and heteroskedasticity during the econometric phase obliged us to modify Luh’s et al (2008) model to accommodate a system equation using panel data. The Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) finds positive impacts of human capital, fixed capital formation, international spillovers and irrigation infrastructure on TFP growth and technical change. Results from the SUR estimation do not give any support to negative impacts from environmental shocks over agricultural TFP growth. Actual Official Development Assistance (ODA) in current dollars, ODA in capital stock form, ratio of ODA to GDP, and ratio of ODA to agricultural GDP were used to represent different variables of foreign aid in the model. For the four specifications, foreign aid was found to have a negative impact, whereas a positive impact in the quadratic form, although this behavior can be specific in countries that compound a heavy external debt like those in Central America. The interaction term used to test for changes of foreign aid effectiveness before and after 1990 was significant for ODA in current dollars and ODA capital stock form. This is indicative of positive changes after the reforms occurred during the 1990’s also giving insights of the contribution of “good” policies. When studying foreign aid ratios to GDP and agricultural GDP, these two variables was not significant giving evidence that foreign aid dependence has a negative impact on agricultural development that does not depend on “good” policies. When calculating the elasticities of TFP to foreign aid, it was found that when ODA takes the form of capital stock, there is a better chance for foreign aid to have a significant positive impact on the development of agriculture.

English Abstract

ABSTRACT This study comprehends two phases for the analysis of agricultural Total Factor Productivity (TFP), its sources and determinants in Central America. In the first phase, DEA Malmquist TFP Index measures are calculated using FAO panel data to build a time trend that will help us to assess the behavior of agricultural TFP and its components during 1961 to 2005. The second phase uses econometric analysis to characterize the agricultural TFP time trends built in the first phase, by regressing the Malmquist index and its technical change component with determinants of agricultural productivity. The explanatory variables include fixed capital formation, human capital, international spillovers, irrigation infrastructure, environmental shocks and foreign aid. The efficiency change component of TFP change was not included since most of the results did not report much technical efficiency change for the exception of Honduras. Agricultural productivity studies have been justified by associating agricultural development with poverty reduction since the majority of the poor population inhabit rural areas and rely on agricultural activities as their main source of livelihoods. It is clear that production increases if more inputs are used or if productivity is improved, the higher conversion of forest land to agricultural uses and the increased needs to secure food. This makes an imperative for a sustainable increase of production by means of productivity growth rather than increasing land area. In the first phase we find four distinctive growth patters of TFP in CA. A steep increasing TFP growth pattern with non detrimental technical efficiency change (Belize and Costa Rica), a gradual TFP growth with non detrimental technical efficiency change (El Salvador and Guatemala), a humble TFP growth with detrimental technical efficiency change (Honduras and Panama) and detrimental TFP growth with non detrimental technical efficiency change (Nicaragua). An important aspect to add is that the main engine that drives agricultural TFP growth is technological change, therefore, if a country fails to update its technology compared to the other countries would not exhibit any improvements in TFP as seen in the case of Nicaragua. The possible error caused by multicollinearity and heteroskedasticity during the econometric phase obliged us to modify Luh’s et al (2008) model to accommodate a system equation using panel data. The Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) finds positive impacts of human capital, fixed capital formation, international spillovers and irrigation infrastructure on TFP growth and technical change. Results from the SUR estimation do not give any support to negative impacts from environmental shocks over agricultural TFP growth. Actual Official Development Assistance (ODA) in current dollars, ODA in capital stock form, ratio of ODA to GDP, and ratio of ODA to agricultural GDP were used to represent different variables of foreign aid in the model. For the four specifications, foreign aid was found to have a negative impact, whereas a positive impact in the quadratic form, although this behavior can be specific in countries that compound a heavy external debt like those in Central America. The interaction term used to test for changes of foreign aid effectiveness before and after 1990 was significant for ODA in current dollars and ODA capital stock form. This is indicative of positive changes after the reforms occurred during the 1990’s also giving insights of the contribution of “good” policies. When studying foreign aid ratios to GDP and agricultural GDP, these two variables was not significant giving evidence that foreign aid dependence has a negative impact on agricultural development that does not depend on “good” policies. When calculating the elasticities of TFP to foreign aid, it was found that when ODA takes the form of capital stock, there is a better chance for foreign aid to have a significant positive impact on the development of agriculture.

Topic Category 生物資源暨農學院 > 農業經濟學研究所
生物農學 > 農業
Reference
  1. Alauddin, M., D. Headey and D.S. Prasada Rao. 2005. “Explaining Agricultural Productivity Levels and Growth: An International Perspective” Working Paper, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. pp 52.
    連結:
  2. Bosworth, B. 1982. “Capital formation and economic policy”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2:273-317.
    連結:
  3. Branstetter, L. 2000. “Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States”. National Bureau of Economic Research Paper. pp 36.
    連結:
  4. Burnside C. and D. Dollar. 2000. “Aid, Policies and Growth. American EconomicReview” 90:847–868.
    連結:
  5. Charnes A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. 1979. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2:419-444.
    連結:
  6. Coelli, T., D. Rao. 2003. Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Malmquist Index Analysis of 93 Countries, 1980-2000. The Journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists. 32:115-134.
    連結:
  7. Damijan, J., M. Knell, B. Majcen, M. Rojec. (2003) “The Role of FDI, R&D Accumulation and Trade in Transferring Technology to Transition Countries Evidence from Firm Panel Data for Eight Transition Countries”. Economic Systems 27: 189-204
    連結:
  8. Dewbre, J. W. Thompson and J. Dewbre. 2007. “Consistency or Conflict in OECD Agricultural Trade and Aid Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89:1161-1167
    連結:
  9. Easterly W. and S. Rebelo. 1993. “Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation.” Elsevier Science publication
    連結:
  10. Fajnzylber, P., and D. Lederman. “Economic Reforms and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean (1950-95)”, in The World Bank, Latin America and the Caribbean Region Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 1999, pp 27
    連結:
  11. Färe, R. and C.A. Lovell. 1977. Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production. Journal of Economic Theory 19:150-162.
    連結:
  12. Farrell, M.J. 1957. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120:253-290.
    連結:
  13. Feeny S. 2007. “Impacts of Foreign Aid to Melanesia.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 12: 34-60
    連結:
  14. Forsunf, F. R. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1979) “Generalized Farrell Measures of Efficiency: An Application to Milk Processing in Swedish Dairy Plants.” The Economic Journal, 89:294-315.
    連結:
  15. Gollin D., Parente S., Rogerson, R. 2002. “The Role of Agriculture in Development American” Economist Review 92:160–164.
    連結:
  16. Gutierrez, L. 2000. “Why is Agricultural Labor Productivity Higher in some Countries than Others.” 2000 Annual Meeting American Agricultural Economics Association. Tampa, Florida. 19 pp.
    連結:
  17. Hadjimichael, Michael T. 1995. “Sub-Saharan Africa: Growth, Savings, and Investment, 1986–93”. IMF Occasional Paper No. 118 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
    連結:
  18. Hayami Y. 1969. “Industrialization and Agricultural Productivity: An International Comparative Study.” Study conducted at Research Department for Economic Growth, Institute of Developing Economies
    連結:
  19. Hayami, Y. 1969. “Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap among Selected Countries.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51:564-75.
    連結:
  20. Hayami, Y. 1970. “On the Use of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function on the Cross-
    連結:
  21. Country Analysis of Agricultural Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 52:327-9.
    連結:
  22. Hayami, Y., and V. W. Ruttan. 1970. “Agricultural Productivity Differences Among
    連結:
  23. Countries.” American Economic Review 60:895-911.
    連結:
  24. Heyneman, S. 1984. “Research on Education in the Developing Countries.” International Journal of Edication Development 4: 293-304.
    連結:
  25. Huffman W.E. 2001. “Human Capital: Education and Agriculture”, Chapter 1 in volume 1 of Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Editors Gardner, B.L. and G.C. Rausser El Sevier
    連結:
  26. Isaksson, A. 2007. “Determinants of Total Factor Productivity: A Literature Review.” Working paper in Research and Statistics Branch, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). 97 pp
    連結:
  27. Jamison, D.T., P.R. Moock. 1984. “Farmer Education and Farm Efficiency in Nepal: The Role of Schooling, Extension Services and Cognitive Skills”. World Development 12:67-86pp.
    連結:
  28. Jeffrey J. 2007. “Productivity Indicators for the Rural Poor in Developing Countries.” Social Indicators Research, 80:535–553
    連結:
  29. Jorgensen D. W. and Z. Griliches. 1967. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” The Review of Economic Studies. 35: 31-62.
    連結:
  30. Kawagoe, T., Y. Hayami and V.W. Ruttan.1986. “The Intercountry Agricultural Production Function and Productivity Differences among Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 19:113-132.
    連結:
  31. Kolasa, M. 2007. “How does FDI inflow affect productivity of domestic firms? The role of horizontal and vertical spillover, absorptive capacity and competition.” Munich Personal RePEc archive. National Bank of Poland Working Paper 29 pp.
    連結:
  32. Konings, J. 2000. “The Effects of Direct Foreign Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies.” Economies in Transition 9: 619-633
    連結:
  33. Lensink, R., H. 2001. “White. Are there Negative Returns to Aid? Journal of Development Studies 42-65 pp
    連結:
  34. Lipton, M. and M. Lipton. 1993. “Creating Rural Livelihoods: Some Lessons for South Africa From Experience Elsewhere”. World Development 21:1515-1548.
    連結:
  35. Luh, Y.H, C.C. Chang and F.M. Huang. 2008. “Efficiency Change and Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis for Selected East Asian Economies.” Journal of Asian Economies 19:312-324.
    連結:
  36. Meijl, H., and F. Tongeren. 1999. “Endogenouse International Technology Spillovers and Biased Technical Change in the GTAP Model.” Global Trade Analysis Project Technical Paper No. 15. 50 pp.
    連結:
  37. Mundlak Y., D. Larson and R. Butzer. 2004. “Agricultural Dynamics in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines.” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48:95-126.
    連結:
  38. Nkusu, M. 2004. “Are there Negative Returns to Aid? A Comment.” Working Paper of the International Monetary Fund 04/212
    連結:
  39. Oliveira Pires, Jorge and Garcia, Fernando. 2004. “Productivity of Nations: A Stochastic Frontier Approach To TFP Decomposition.” Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Brazil, Econometric Societies meeting number 292.
    連結:
  40. Piesse J., Thirtle C. and Lin L. 2003. “The Impact of Research-Led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America.” World Development. 31:1959-1975.
    連結:
  41. Rosenweig, M. H. Binswager. 1992. “Wealth, Weather Risk and the Composition and Profitability of Agricultural Investments.” Working Paper Technichal Department Latin America and the Caribbean, World Bank.
    連結:
  42. Russell, R.R. 1985. Measures of Technical Efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 35:109-126.
    連結:
  43. Ruttan V. (2002) Productivity Growth in World Agriculture: Sources and Constraints. Staff paper, pp 49.
    連結:
  44. Sentgupta, J. K. 2003. “New Efficiency Theory, With Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis.” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg pp 174.
    連結:
  45. Sueyoshi, T. and K. Sekitani. 2009. “DEA Congestion and Returns to Scale under an Occurrence of Multiple Projections.” European Journal of Operational Research. 196:764-794.
    連結:
  46. Sharmistha Selfa, Richard Grabowski. 2009. “Economic Development and the Role of Agricultural Technology.” Agricultural Economics 36:395–404
    連結:
  47. The World Bank Development report, Agriculture for Development 2007 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, 386 pg.
    連結:
  48. The World Development Report 2000/2001. Attacking Poverty, Oxford University Press, 2000.
    連結:
  49. Timmer, C. P. 1995. “Getting agriculture moving: do markets provide the right signals?” Food Policy 20:455–472.
    連結:
  50. Teruel, R., Y. Kuroda. 2005. “Public Infrastructure and Productivity Growth in Phillipine Agriculture, 1974-2000.” Journal of Asian Economics 16:555-576.
    連結:
  51. United Nations, Millennium Goal Report 2006, United Nations department of Economic and Social Affairs (June 2006 ) 32 pages
    連結:
  52. Verhagen J., Wösten H. And De Jager A. 2008. Agriculture and Environment, Science for Agriculture and Rural Development in Low-income Countries, Chapter 4, Agrosystems Research, Springer Science + Business Media B.V. pp 57–75.
    連結:
  53. Wolff, E.N. 2000. Human Capital Investment and Economic Growth: Exploring the Cross- Country Evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11: 433-472
    連結:
  54. World Food Summit. 1996. Technical background documents 1-15. Rome, FAO.
    連結:
  55. WSSD (World Summit on Sustainable Development), 2002. United Nations Johannesburg Summit. www.un.org/jsummit/.
    連結:
  56. References
  57. Ajae, O.A. “Empirical Analysis of Agricultural Productivity Growth in Sub-Sahara Africa: 1961- 2003”. Agricultural Economics and Extension Department Ladoke Akintola University of Technology. pp 26.
  58. Astorga, P., A. Bergés, and V. Fitzgerald. 2004. “Productivity Growth in Latin America, During the Twentieth Century”, Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, pp 52.
  59. Avila D., A. Flavio and R. Evenson. “Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: The Role of Technological Capital.” This article is part of a postdoctoral research carried out, at the Economic Growth Center, Yale University (New Haven, CT., USA) by Flavio Avila, under the supervision of Prof. Robert Evenson.
  60. Barahona, J. F.2006. “Caracterizacion Paisajistico y Definicion de Lineamientos de Manejo en la Zona de Recarga de Las Cuencas de La Soledad, Las Minas y El Cobre, Valle de Angeles, Honduras” Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Agricultura. pp 112
  61. Bravo-Ortega C. and D. Lederman. 2004. “Agricultural Productivity and its Determinants: Revisiting International Experiences.” Estudios de Economia, 31:133-163
  62. Chauvet L., and P. Guillaumont. (2007). Aid and Growth Revisited: Policy, economic vulnerability and political instability. Paper Presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics “Towards Pro-Poor Policies”
  63. Coelli T.J, Rao D.S., O’Donnell and G.E. Battese. 2004. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Second Edition. Springer Science Business Media.
  64. Crespo, R. 2005. “Total Factor Productivity: An Unobserved Components Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature Discussion PaperSchool of Economics, Finance and Management, Department of Economics, University of Bristol. pp 31
  65. Durbarry, R., N. Gemmell and D. Greenaway.“New Evidence on the Impact of Foreign Aid on economic Growth”. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade research paper No. 98/8. pp 47
  66. Evenson 1993 “India: population pressure, technology, infrastructure, capital formation, and rural incomes. Report of workshop Population and land use in Developing Countries
  67. Fan, S., S. Jitsuchon and N. Methakunnavut. 2004. “The Importance of Public Investment for Reducing Rural Poverty in Middle-Income Countries: The Case of Thailand.” Discussion paper no.7, International Food Policy Research Institute
  68. Fan, S., N. Rao. 2003. “Public Spending in Developing Countries: Trends, Determination and Impact.” Discussion Paper for Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute. pp 54
  69. Hansen, H. and F. Tarp. 2000. “Aid and Growth Regressions”. Journal of Development Economics. 64: 547-570.
  70. Hazell, P.B.R. and Fan, S. 2002. “The Importance Of Public Investments And Institutions For The Functioning Of Food Markets.” In Developing Countries, In Lutz, Clemens, ed. Food Markets and Food Security in West Africa, CDS Research Report 15, 99-115. Centre for Development Studies (CSD).
  71. Kaya, O., I. Kaya and L. Gunter. 2008. “The Impact of Agriculture Aid on Agriculture Sector Growth” selected paper for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Dallas, TX, Febreuary, 2008.
  72. Lau, L., D. Jamison and F. Louat. 1991. “Education and Productivity in Developing Countries. An Aggregate Production Function Approach.” Working Paper for the World Development Report. 38 pp.
  73. Lall, P. A.M. Featherstone, David N.W. 2002. “Productivity Growth in the Western Hemisphere (1978-94): The Caribbean in Perspective.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17:213-231,
  74. Lipton M., and M. Ravallion . 1993. “Poverty and Policy”. The World Bank, Policy Research Department, pp 126.
  75. Lipton M. 2005. “The Family Farm in a Globalize World: The Role of Crop Science in Alleviating Poverty.” International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020 discussion paper, pp 44.
  76. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Honduras, Strategic Plan for the Development of the agriculuture sector 2006-2010, (2005) 115 pg.
  77. Mosher, T.M. 1966. “Getting Agriculture Moving, Essentials for Development and Modernization.” New York: Agriculture Development Council
  78. Mundlak Y., D. Larson and R. Butzer. 2002. “Determinants of Agricultural Growth in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thialand.” The World Bank Development Research Group. Policy Research Working Paper 2803. 82 pp.
  79. Norton, G.W., J. Ortiz and P.G. Pardey. 1992. “The Impact of Foreign Aid in Agricultural Development.” Journal of Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40: 775-786
  80. Peter Hazell and Joachim von Braun. 2006. “Aid to Agriculture, Growth and Poverty Reduction, Guest Editorial”. The Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists pg. 6-13.
  81. Reyes W., Manejo Integrado de Cuencas, Classes del 2004, Universidad Nacional de Agricultura, pp 64.
  82. Royer, J. “Cooperative Theory: A Neoclassical Approach.” Draft. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, pp 35
  83. Sargent, T. and E. Rodriguez. 2000. “Labor or Total Factor Productivity: Do We Need to Choose?”. Draft. Economic Policies, Department of Finance, Canada. pp 13
  84. Sentgupta, J. K. 1989. “Efficiency Analysis by Production Frontiers, The Nonparametric Approach.” Theory and Decision Library, Series B: Systems Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 246 pp.
  85. Stringer, R. 2001. “How Important are the “Nontraditional” Economic Roles of Agriculture In Development” Discussion Paper, Adelaide University
  86. Valenzuela E., M. Ivanic, C. Ludena and T. W Hertel. 2005. “Agriculture Productivity Growth: Is the Current Trend on the Track to Poverty Reduction?” Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics, Association Annual Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island
  87. Zepeda, L., (2001) “Agricultural Investment, Production Capacity and Productivity” chapter 1 inside “Agriculture Investment and Productivity in Developing Countries.” FAO Corporate Document Repository, Economic and Social Development Department.