透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.173.112
  • 期刊

紈袴子弟與流氓教授:台灣的教育與階級流動

Education and Social Mobility in Taiwan

摘要


本文採用「華人家庭動態資料庫」研究父代與子代間階級流動的情況,並探討教育成就是否爲促進代間階級流動的重要管道。實證結果發現父代爲上層階級的子代接受高等教育相對最具有優勢,相較於勞工階級與農民階級子代,中產階級的子代也有較高的機會接受高等教育。另一方面,教育成就對社會階級亦有著顯著的影響,愈高的教育成就進入上層階級的相對勝算比也愈高,尤其具大學以上教育成就更有高度的優勢。特別是相對於國小以下教育程度,受專科教育爲子代進入上層階級帶來了優勢,而這樣的優勢效果在來自非上層階級的子代又比來自上層階級的子代爲大。即先天上家庭環境的不足仍可藉由後天教育成就的提升而改善階級壟斷!而高中與專科教育程度可造就出最有機會進入中產階級的優勢,惟教育成就高低對進入上層階級的相對勝算比不會因爲不同的世代而有所不同。整體而言,教育的普及與避免教育壟斷的確有助於社會階級代間的向上流動,故教育政策的首要目標應該避免產生階級壟斷教育的現象,唯有人人教育機會均等的環境,才能真正達到階級的有效流動,讓窮人有真正翻身的機會。

並列摘要


Using Taiwan's Panel Study of Family Dynamics data, this paper investigates intergenerational social mobility and analyzes whether education can be an effective means for fostering social mobility. Empirical results find that father's social status affects an individual's educational attainment. Offspring whose father is in the upper class have a better chance of receiving higher education than those whose father is not. Moreover, education has a profound influence on social status. The higher the educational attainment is, especially for university and above, the greater the chance one will be in the upper-class. The education advantage confers for entry into the upper class does not vary among different cohorts. This implies that the upper-class may dominate education to preserve their social status. However, other things being equal, those with junior college education but whose fathers are not in the upper-class tend to have a greater chance to be in the upper-class than those whose father is in the upper-class. Hence, education can still be an effective means to compensate for the disadvantage in one's father's social status. We also find that senior high school and junior college education confer the greatest chance to be in the middle class, which is conducive to social stability. Our results confirm that popularization of education is beneficial to intergenerational social mobility. Thus, equal opportunity to attain education and prevention of monopoly in education by the upper class should be the ultimate goal of a government's educational policy, as it not only enhances one's earning capability but also fosters social mobility.

參考文獻


陳婉琪(2005)。族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異。台灣社會學。10,1-40。
駱明慶(2004)。升學機會與家庭背景。經濟論文叢刊。32(4),417-445。
駱明慶(2001)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊。30(1),113-147。
莊奕琦、賴偉文(2008)。影響教育成就的因素及九年國民義務教育政策效果評析台灣實證。人文及社會科學集刊。20(1),25-65。

被引用紀錄


陳冠霖(2014)。跨代社會流動─以台灣資料實證分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02387
張夏鳳(2014)。母親職業對國中子女學習表現的影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01092
陳盈雪(2013)。高等教育領域之階級優惠性差別待遇-以大學入學為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00496
徐嘉璘(2012)。社會階級與投票抉擇—以2008年總統選舉分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00508
陳良瑋(2016)。學歷有用嗎?成年初期薪資、職業地位發展軌跡及性別差異〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615102926

延伸閱讀