透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.174.95
  • 期刊

論國家限制親權的憲法正當性-從虐童談起

The Constitutionality of the Limitation on Parental Rights: From the Phenomenon of Child Abuse

摘要


適度的懲戒與虐待,有時僅有一線之隔。當父母對其子女進行懲戒時,往往會造成子女身體上的傷害,因而侵害子女的身體不受傷害權。基於虐待會對兒童的人格產生嚴重的影響,且親權本身即含有利他的性質,國家面對父母濫用其權利時,得以限制親權的手段來保障兒童的身體不受傷害權。然而,在此又會出現另一個問題,當國家爲保護兒童的身體不受傷害權而限制父母的親權時,另一方面也會侵害到兒童的家庭成長權。而家庭成長權屬於人格權的一環,受憲法基本權的保障,就此而言,縱使國家爲有效保護兒童而限制其家庭成長權也需有憲法正當性,本文認爲其憲法正當性即在於兒童的最佳利益。最後,要強調的一點是,家庭有其不可取代的功能,國家限制親權的目的並非要取代家庭的功能,毋寧其係處於輔助家庭功能健全的角色,讓兒童能在健全的家庭中成長。

並列摘要


An excess of discipline turns to abuse. When parents exercise their discipline power towards children, it will lead to the physical harm of the children. Since abuse has a great effect upon children's personality and the core of parental rights is for children's good, state can protect children from abuse by limiting parental rights; namely, states can limit parental rights to guarantee children's right not to be physically harmed. However, another problem appears: though the purpose of limiting parental rights is to secure children from being harmed, yet it will infringe children's right to grow up in the family. Owing to children's right to grow up in the family is part of personal rights, which is guaranteed by the Constitution, state should ensure its constitutionality in limiting children's right to grow up in the family. This article believes that the constitutional legitimacy of state to limit children's right to grow up in the family is based on the best interests of the children. Last but not least, family has it irreplaceable functions. The goal of States to limit parental rights is not to replace the functions of family, but to assist family instead.

參考文獻


何希皓(1996)。未成年人的基本權利:以德國法爲中心,並論我國之情形(碩士論文)。輔仁大學法律學研究所。
李宏文(2004)。論子女最佳利益原則(碩士論文)。台北大學法律學研究所。
李建良(2000)。基本權利與國家保護義務,憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
李惠宗(2006)。憲法要義。元照。
李震山(2001)。從憲法觀點論身體不受傷害權,人性尊嚴與人權保障。元照。

被引用紀錄


謝湘雲(2017)。大陸配偶與外籍配偶居留權益之比較〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00028
吳糧竹(2011)。使用無線電波頻譜事前許可制之法律議題探討〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2011.00391
陳彥任(2016)。行政機關公司化後適用國家賠償法之研究-以桃園國際機場股份有限公司為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201600403
林倍伸(2016)。論妨害公務罪──以法治國家中的公務概念為核心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201610363
蕭敏彣(2016)。我國與日本未成年監護制度之比較研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603416

延伸閱讀