本研究旨在探討慢速壘球運動參與者參與動機、休閒滿意度與幸福感之間的關係。採問卷調查法進行,以嘉義地區慢速壘球運動參與者為研究對象,問卷發放450分,回收393份有效問卷,有效回收率為83.3%。所得資料經統計分析結果顯示:(一)慢速壘球運動參與者背景變項在參與動機之差異分析結果顯示婚姻狀況、每月收入及運動年資等變項在參與動機上皆未達顯著性差異。在年齡、教育程度達顯著性差異。(二)慢速壘球運動參與者背景變項在休閒滿意度之差異分析結果顯示年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、每月收入、運動年資等變項在休閒滿意度上皆未達顯著性差異。(三)慢速壘球運動參與者背景變項在幸福感之差異分析結果顯示年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、每月收入、運動年資等變項在休閒滿意度上皆未達顯著性差異。僅在年齡達顯著性差異。(四)PLS分析顯示,慢速壘球運動參與者的參與動機會正向影響其休閒滿意度,參與動機會正向影響其幸福感,休閒滿意度會正向影響其幸福感,而休閒滿意度在模式中是屬於部分中介效果。(五)本研究模式中參與動機變項能解釋休閒滿意度變項的14%解釋變異量,而參與動機與休閒滿意度變項能解釋幸福感變項的31%解釋變異量。
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship among the participation motivation, leisure satisfaction and well-being in slow softball participants. This research were conducted by questionnaire. The sample of this study includes slow softball participants in Chaiyi. We sent out 450 questionnaires and retrieve 393 were vaild, the valid retrieve rate was 83.3%. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. The analysis of the difference in participation motivation of the background variables of the slow softball participants showed that the marital status, monthly income and sports seniority did not reach significant differences in participation motivation. There were significant differences in age and education. 2. The results of the differences in leisure satisfaction between the background variables of the slow softball participants showed that the age, marital status, education level, monthly income, and sports seniority did not reach significant differences in leisure satisfaction. 3. The results of the differences in well-being between the background variables of the s slow softball participants showed that the age, marital status, education level, monthly income, and sports seniority did not reach significant differences in leisure satisfaction but it reach significant differences in age. 4. PLS analysis showed that the participation motivation of slow softball participants affected positively their leisure satisfaction. Participation motivation affected positively their well-being. Leisure satisfaction affected positively their well-being, while leisure satisfaction is part of the mediation effect in the model. 5. In this research model, the participation motivation variables can explain the 14% explanatory variation of the leisure satisfaction variable, while the participation motivation and leisure satisfaction variables can explain the 31% explanatory variation of the well-being variable.