透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.185.123
  • 期刊

非戰之罪:研究評鑑制度下台灣社會學學術專書論著之困境

An Unfair Game: The Dilemmas Posed by Academic Research Evaluation to Sociology Monograph Writing in Taiwan

摘要


人文與社會科學向來重視學術專書,但近年因研究評鑑大幅強調期刊論文,對人社學科的專書生產已經造成壓抑。本研究以深度訪談來了解14位有專書論著經驗的社會學學者對專書及研究評鑑的看法,包含專書對社會學的價值與貢獻、期刊導向的評鑑制度對社會學造成的影響、專書寫作可能遭遇的問題與困難,以及可能的改善之道。基於受訪者意見,本文也深入討論了專書寫作歷程考核與專書評鑑的本質性問題,期能作為未來評鑑制度改善之參考。

並列摘要


Scholarly books, or scholarly monographs, are an important form of research output in humanities and social sciences. However, the current research evaluation practices in Taiwan highly emphasize journal articles and have thereby suppressed the production of scholarly books. This study employed in-depth interviews with 14 Taiwanese sociologists who had written and published scholarly books to understand the problems and challenges facing scholarly monograph production in the contemporary research evaluation culture. Interview topics included the values and contributions of scholarly books to the studies of sociology, the negative influences of journal-focused research evaluations on the sociology discipline, problems and challenges facing book-writing sociologists, and possible solutions to those problems. Based on the findings, the authors discuss on the proposed research review approach that monitors an author's book-writing progress rather than focusing on the end-product, as raised in the interviews, as well as the problems and reliability issues with the pre-publishing anonymous review requirement that has become a mandate for scholarly book publishing in Taiwan.

參考文獻


反思會議工作小組編(2006)。全球化與知識生產—反思台灣學術評鑑。台北市=Taipei: Taiwan:台灣社會研究季刊社=Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies。
吳紹群(2010)。臺灣地區人文學學術出版與學術傳播之研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
孟祥傑(2003年10月21日)。論文篇數台大最多 長庚第5政大排48。聯合報,A6版。【Meng, Hsiang-Chieh (2003, October 21). Lunwen pianshu taida zuiduo changgeng di 5 zhengda pai 48. United Daily News, A6. (in Chinese)】

延伸閱讀