透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.189.7
  • 期刊

《詩經》研究中之文獻解讀問題

Hermeneutic Issues in the Study of the Shijing

摘要


《詩經》爲中國古代一部重要經典,有關《詩經》之訓解,自先秦以來,歷代不絕,構成研究《詩經》之重要文獻。若欲研究《詩經》,則對於《詩經》文本及其相關文獻之解讀,乃是重要之探討起點,倘若解讀不當,則易造成誤判或得出錯誤結論。因此,文獻解讀爲《詩經》研究中不可忽視之問題。 本文將針對以下幾方面,舉出一些實例加以討論 (一)《詩經》文獻解讀必須符合訓詁之基本原則 (二)《詩經》文獻解讀必須具備《詩經》學之基本知識 (三)《詩經》文獻解讀不可忽略其他領域之相關知識 (四)《詩經》文獻解讀須前後論理一致圓融自足 (五)《詩經》文獻解讀應避免作過度詮釋 經由以上之討論,希望能突顯文獻解讀在《詩經》研究中之重要性,並期待《詩經》研究者能更重視此問題。

關鍵字

經典 詩經 文獻解讀 訓詁

並列摘要


The Shijing is one of the most important classics of ancient China. Since ancient times, interpretation of the text has continued, unbroken through countless successive generations, producing an important body of literature on the research of the text. If one desires to research the Shijing, then an important starting point is the interpretation of various editions of the text and related commentaries; If the hermeneutic approach is inappropriate, then one can easily arrive at erroneous judgments or conclusions. Therefore, within the field of Shijing studies, textual hermeneutics is an issue which cannot be overlooked. This article shall focus on the following aspects of textual hermeneutics within the study of the Shijing: (1) Shijing textual interpretation must conform to the fundamental principles of traditional exegetic technique (shungu). (2) Textual interpretation of the Shijing, one must rely on a fundamental understanding of Shijing scholarship. (3) Shijing textual hermeneutics cannot neglect related knowledge from other fields. (4) In interpreting the Shijing, one must always strive for the most reasonable, consistent and internally coherent explanation. (5) In Shijing textual hermeneutics, one should avoid making excessive annotations. Through a discussion of the above points, I hope to emphasize the importance of textual hermeneutic principles in the study of the Shijing and advocate that Shijing scholars pay more attention to this issue.

並列關鍵字

Classics Shijing Hermencuties Exegesis Interpretation

參考文獻


漢孔安國傳、唐孔穎達正義(1955)。尚書注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。
漢毛氏傳、漢鄭玄箋、唐孔穎達正義(1955)。毛詩注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。
晉郭璞注、宋邢昺疏(1955)。爾雅注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。
唐陸德明(1975)。經典釋文。臺北:鼎文書局。
唐長孫無忌(1986)。唐律疏義。臺北:弘文館出版社。

被引用紀錄


張雅琪(2015)。《毛詩正義》單疏本研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615095946

延伸閱讀