尋求學術研究與政策分析平衡的中國研究：政治大學東亞研究所的志業

Chinese studies in search of a balance between policy and academic research: objectives of the Institute of East Asian Affairs at Chengchi University

王信賢(Wang, Hsin-Hsien) ； 趙春山(Chao, Chun-Shan)

《東亞研究》 49卷2期 (2018/12) Pp. 83-112

https://doi.org/10.30402/EAS.201812_49(2).0004

摘要

五十年以來，東亞所一直是國內研究中國大陸問題的重鎮。創所之初，其一方面為以中國大陸為主要研究對象的區域研究所，與專業學科的研究一直有所區隔；另一方面又以「培養反共思想鬥爭的人」為創所目的，故雖隱身在學術機構，卻是肩負著政策研究的使命。基於此，本文將從學術與政策研究、區域研究與專業學科間的關係，探討東亞所的發展與變遷。此外，本文也點出東亞所乃至台灣中國研究所面臨的挑戰，包括專業智庫的不足、培養政策人才不易，以及此領域容易受政治立場影響等。

關鍵字

東亞研究所 ； 中國研究 ； 學術研究 ； 政策分析 ； 智庫

並列摘要

For the past fifty years, the Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies has been a key contributor to Mainland China studies nationally. The institute was initially established as an institute of area studies focused predominantly on Mainland China and kept separate from academic research. Its founding purpose was to ＂cultivate individuals for the struggle against communist thought,＂ and while hidden within in an academic institution, it was at the same time tasked with policy research. As such, this paper shall examine change and development in the Institute of East Asian Affairs, in both the relationship between academic and policy research and between area studies and academic disciplines. In addition, this paper shall also identify challenges facing the institute as an institution of China studies in Taiwan, including a shortage of professional think tanks, the difficulties of cultivating outstanding policymakers, and the vulnerability of the field to the influence of different political standpoints.

並列關鍵字

Graduate Institute of East Asian Affairs ； China studies ； academic research ； policy analysis ； think tanks

參考文獻

Max Weber. 2014，《學術與政治：韋伯選集（I）》，錢永祥譯，台北：遠流出版。譯自Science and Politics: Selected Works of Max Weber(I). 2014. Max Weber. 2014. “Xueshu yu zhengzhi: weibo xuanji (I)”. Chien, Sechin Y. S. trans. Taipei: Yuan-Liou. Translated from Science and Politics: Selected Works of Max Weber(I). 2014.

王信賢，2000，〈西方中國研究之新制度典範分析〉，《中國大陸研究》，43（8）：23-46。Wang, Hsin-hsien. 2000. “Xifang zhongguo yanjiu zhi xinzhidu dianfan fenxi” [An Analysis on the Neo-Institutionalist Paradigm of Contemporary Western China Studies]. Mainland China Studies 43 (8): 23-46.

王棟，2009，〈雙重超越的困境：中國國際關係理論與政策芻議〉，《國際政治研究》，3：12-28。Wang, Dong. 2009. “Shuangchong chaoyue de kunjing: zhongguo guoji guanxi lilun yu zhengce zouyi” [Overcoming the Dual Dilemma: A Discussion of Theory and Policy in Chinese Studies of International Relations]. International Politics Quarterly 3: 12-28.

王緝思，2009，〈學術研究與政策研究相脫節的癥結與出路〉，《國際政治研究》，3：1-11。Wang, Ji-si. 2009. “Xueshu yanjiu yu zhengce yanjiu xiang tuojie de zhengjie yu chulu” [How to Narrow the Gap between Scholarly Research and Policy-oriented Studies in IR]. International Politics Quarterly 3: 1-11.

朱雲漢、明居正、楊志恆，1997，《中共對台智庫角色之研究》，台北：行政院陸委會。Chu, Yun-han. Chu-cheng Ming, and Chih-heng Yang. 1997. Zhonggong duitaizhiku jiaose zhi yanjiu [The Research of the Role of China's Think Tank toward Taiwan ]. Taipei: Mainland Affairs Council