整地行為與土石採取法關聯性之探討－以臺南市為例

A Case Study on the Relationship between Soil Preparation and Sand and Gravel Excavation Act-Tainan City

施信宏(Hsin-Hung Shih) ； 邱耀毅(Yao-Yi Chiu)

《臺灣鑛業》 65卷4期 (2013/12) Pp. 24-31

摘要

臺南市農漁產業幾乎為全臺之冠，相關整地案件甚多，由於法令不臻明確，致民眾常誤觸法網，故本文以該市最常發生之農地整地、漁塭整地及山坡地整地等3類整地態樣進行分析探討，依其可能衍生違法部分，可分為：土石採取及非土石採取2類，涉「土石採取」者，自應依土石採取法裁罰；而涉「非土石採取」者，則依不同適用法令而定：山坡地整地－以水土保持法，農地整地、魚塭整地一以區域計劃法、都市計畫法等為主要裁罰法令。另有鑑於多數地方政府對於整地行為衍生違規之認定、處置等作業，尚未建立明確之因應機制，故本文試著針對因整地行為衍生違規時之處理流程提出一套建議流程，提供作為日後處理相關類似案件之參考。

關鍵字

整地 ； 土石採取

並列摘要

The agricultural and fishery production of Tainan municipal city have been a first place in Taiwan area for a long time, and therefore there are many related soil preparation cases in the city. Because relevant Acts is not so clear, that cause's people often inadvertently breaking the law. Among them, the agricultural land, fish pond and hillside where are the three most common cases in Tainan city, can be used for analysis and discussion.From the viewpoint of law violation type, these activities can be classified into ”sand and gravel excavation” and ”non-sand and gravel excavation” two categories. The former ones are subject to the application of ”Sand and Gravel Excavation Act”. The later ones then should be regulated under the applicable laws and regulations, serving as the main penalty basis. For example, soil preparation of hillside is subject to ”Soil and Water Conservation Act”. Soil preparation of fish pond and agricultural land are subject to ”Regional Plan Act” and ”Urban Plan Act”.It is found that most local governments could not establish a response mechanism yet to identify and tackle the violation due to conducting soil preparation. Therefore, this paper attempts to propose a set of processing procedure for tackling cases mentioned above, for future reference.

並列關鍵字

Soil Preparation ； Sand and Gravel Excavation