透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.177.223
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

福山植物園遊客資料調查分析

Survey of Visitor Information in the Fushan Botanical Garden, Taiwan

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以系統逢機取樣,人員訪問法,於1996年5月至10月及1997年6至8月間進行問卷調查福山植物園遊客的性質、對值物園之概念、對植物園之滿意度及對管理措施之意見、遊園行為等。計得有效問卷669份。各項資料分別以百分比統計圖、獨立性與相關性進行分析。調查結果顯示:福山的遊客以軍公教人員為主(28.5%),大部份遊客能區別福山與一般公園或遊樂區不同(95.65%),參訪動機主要為喜愛這裹的環境(28.9%)、以前沒來過(28.2%)、因媒體宣傳慕名而來(26.0%),園區內主要活動為觀賞風景(22.2%)、認識樹木(21.2%)、散步(21.0%),整體觀感覺得滿意(80.5%),整個園區感覺乾淨(96.1%),設施認為不夠的遊客,建議增加解說設施(45.6%),認識植物及取得資訊的方式以解說牌為主(42.9%),對入園限制及各項保育措施遊客認同很高(80%以上),且遊客認為限制使用為最有效及可行的措施。綜合言之,福山植物園的經營管理己獲受訪民眾高度肯定,但在發揮植物園的環境教育功能上,仍有許多地方需要加以改善。

並列摘要


A survey concerning Fushan Botanical Garden visitors' general information, opinions, behavior, and experience, etc. was conducted during May to October 1996 and June to August 1997. Totally 669 effective questionnaires were collected by systematic random sampling and analyzed using frequency distribution figures. The results are as follow. The majority of visitors are civil servants (28.5%) in this survey. Most of the sampled visitors perceived differences between the Fushan Botanical Garden and general parks or recreation areas (95.65%). The primary motivations of their visit were to appreciate the environment (28.9%), hadn't been here before (28.2%), and had seen an advertisement in the media (26.0%). Sightseeing (22.2%), learning about trees (21.2%), and taking a walk (21.0%) were the most preferred activities. The overall satisfaction level was high (80.5%), and 96.1% of the visitors felt that the Garden was clean (96.1%). The visitors who thought there were not enough facilities in the Garden suggested providing interpretive facilities as the most important demand (45.6%). Reading interpretive boards was the most frequently used way (42.9%) to learn about trees and to gain knowledge. Further, visitors wishly (over 80%) agreed with the restrictions and conservation policies. In conclusion, sampled visitors highly approved of the management of this botanical garden. However, there is a need to improve in the areas of environmental education, so that the educational function of the botanical garden can be extended.

被引用紀錄


張瑞光(2009)。生態旅遊產業品牌識別設計與應用—以阿里磅生態農場為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315151704
黃文蓉(2014)。福山研究中心實施環境教育之課程發展歷程分析〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613572979

延伸閱讀


  • 林朝欽、董世良、邱文良(2002)。福山植物園自然敎育活動之評估戶外遊憩研究15(3),1-10。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.2002.15(3)1
  • 吳俊賢、李魁賢、利玉芳、林鷺、蔡榮勇、陳秀珍、李昌憲(2020)。福山植物園生態詩之旅林業研究專訊27(4),47-55。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16056922-202008-202010200007-202010200007-47-55
  • 陳麗琴、汪大雄、黃進睦、林國銓(2002)。福山植物園遊憩經濟效益之評估臺灣林業科學17(3),375-385。https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200209.0375
  • 黃惠、王相華(2019)。福山植物園清流雙月刊(19),80-86。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20210507002-201901-202105200012-202105200012-80-86
  • 邱文良、林朝欽(1992)。The Survey of Visitor Informations in Taipei Botanical Garden林業試驗所研究報告季刊7(1),15-21。https://doi.org/10.7075/BTFRI.199203.0015