本研究目的為探討體育系學生學科與術科之目標取向、自我效能與自我設限的關係,釐清學科目標取向與術科自我效能對學科自我設限的交互作用,以及術科目標取向與學科自我效能對術科自我設限的交互作用。經臺灣北部與南部三所國立大學的體育系大學部一到四年級學生為研究對象,以相隔一週分二次的方式進行學科與術科的問卷調查,分別測量學科與術科之目標取向、自我效能及自我設限,得到有效資料共354份。研究結果顯示:第一,不論是在術科或學科,自我效能和工作取向的交互作用能顯著預測自我設限。第二,術科自我取向與學科自我效能的交互作用顯著預測術科自我設限。本研究有三點結論,首先,以目標取向、自我效能與自我設限,有助於瞭解體育系學生在術科與學科的學習動機與學習態度。其次,不論是術科或學科,自我效能會和工作取向發生交互作用,降低自我設限的學習態度。最後,學科自我效能會和術科自我取向產生交互作用,使學生陷入自我調整的困境,提高術科的自我設限。
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among goal orientation, self-efficacy and self-handicapping in students, whose major is physical education (PE). We further examined the interaction of sports goal orientation and academic self-efficacy on sports self-handicapping, and demonstrated the interaction of academic goal orientation and sports self-efficacy on academic self-handicapping. Data were collected with one week separation in academic and sports disciplines from 3 diverse samples of university students, who were major in PE (N = 354). Results revealed that the interaction of task-orientation and self-efficacy was significantly predicted the self-handicapping, which was observed in both academic and sports. The interaction of sport ego-orientation and academic self-efficacy significantly predicted the sport self-handicapping. Three conclusions from this study were as follows; first, goal orientation, self-efficacy, and self-handicapping were useful to understand the PE students' learning motivation and attitude in both sports and academic fields. Second, the learning self-efficacy could be generalized, and decrease self-handicapping for sports and academic disciplines. Third, academic self-efficacy was interactive with sports ego-orientation, which maybe probable in self-regulation pitfalls, and needed more reasons to explain his/her failure in sports.