透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.6.75
  • 期刊

眾聲喧嘩即倫理實踐:從Mikhail Bakhtin的語藝觀談起

Heteroglossia as the Practice of Ethics: A Perspective on Rhetoric from Mikhail Bakhtin

摘要


本研究旨在從Mikhail Bakhtin的語藝觀,就眾聲喧嘩作為倫理實踐進行理論建構。首先,透過將眾聲喧嘩饒富辯證性與烏托邦色彩的倫理向度,本研究勾勒其語藝觀具體展現為詰問的必要性、倡議的有限/效性以及行動的策略性。其次,藉由Bakhtin複調小說作者與主角在外在對話性中重塑話語階層的主張,並進一步接合Butler的諧擬展演,本研究指出語藝言者策略性地依附於社會規約,但又能伺機暴露既定文化的強迫性與暴力性,即是眾聲喧嘩作為倫理實踐的語藝動能。

並列摘要


This study argues that heteroglossia should be regarded as the practice of ethics theoretically, based on Mikhail Bakhtin's perspective of rhetoric. This paper outlines dialectics and utopianism by referring to the necessity of rejoinder, the limitedness/effectiveness of advocacy, and the strategy of action inherent in the rhetoric of heteroglossia. Furthermore, a possible path is explored for practicing the ethics of heteroglossia by articulating Bakhtin's stratifications of language, as implicated in the outer dialogicity of polyphonic novels and Judith Butler's parodic performance. This study concludes that the ethics of heteroglossia might be embodied by temporary attachment to social prohibition; hereafter, the compulsory and contingent category of the pregiven cultural norms could be strategically disclosed through the rhetorical act of rhetor furthermore.

參考文獻


中國時報(2013.11.04)。〈伴侶盟爭取婚姻平權 多元成家攻防 價值觀大論戰〉,《中國時報》,A6 版
王孝勇(2009)。掙脫語言的枷鎖?從Mikhail Bakhtin 論「表述」談起。政治與社會哲學評論。30,203-244。
王孝勇(2011)。Mikhail Bakhtin 狂歡節概念的民主化意涵:從批判取向論述分析的理論困境談起。新聞學研究。108,183-223。
王孝勇(2012)。Mikhail Bakhtin 的對話主義及其對批判論述分析的再延伸:以白玫瑰運動為例。政治與社會哲學評論。40,149-202。
王孝勇(2013)。從對話到對立的民主化實踐:Mikhail Bakhtin 對話主義的理論轉折與政治方案之初探。台灣民主季刊。10(3),1-39。

被引用紀錄


王孝勇(2019)。對話之外:從巴赫汀晚年「外部性」的觀點新義看理解的(不)可能性政治與社會哲學評論(70),57-108。https://doi.org/10.6523/SOCIETAS.201909_(70).002
王孝勇(2018)。逆反時光、探訪視覺:視覺語藝的古典脈絡與其示現傳播研究與實踐8(2),213-248。https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP.2018.07_8(2).0007

延伸閱讀