透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.74.227
  • 期刊

從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構

Constructing a Typology for Court-Referred Males of Intimate Partner Violence based on Changing Relationalism Perspectives

摘要


男性親密暴力有其變異性,因此實用有效的分類是理解其心理機制的重要基礎。目前較受關注的國內外分類架構皆未考量華人關係主義及其變遷的影響性,且常植基於受暴女性觀點,以致未能周延反映台灣強制處遇男性親密暴力者的主觀經驗。因此本研究嘗試從華人關係主義文化變遷的適應觀點出發,以強制處遇男性親密暴力者的經驗敘說為主體,佐以司法文件作為校正素材,進行分類建構。為達此目的,本研究在方法學上遵循建構主義典範,邀請24名男性接受半結構深度訪談,其中6人為家暴專監的親密暴力收容人,18人為某地方法院裁定社區親密暴力強制處遇之相對人,所得訪談文本以共識質性研究法進行分析。研究結果綜合出五個分類向度,包括華人父權認同與親密暴行、伴侶角色實踐的省思、從子女關注到伴侶關注、酒精使用、人格與臨床症狀;據此五個向度將受訪者分成四個類型,包括自我調整型、避罰傳統型、混亂再犯型、反擊型。本研究並針對研究結果與其意涵進行討論。

關鍵字

文化變遷 家庭暴力 華人 類型學

並列摘要


Males who commit intimate partner violence vary across cases, so a practical and valid typological frame work is essential for understanding the psychological mechanisms and characteristics of male perpetra-torsviolence. However, many well-known western typologies have not considered traditional Chinese Relationalism and the changing context within the Taiwanese society. Additionally, existing typologies are often based on female descriptions about male batterers; thus, they are limited in terms of their utility in understanding the subjective phenomenon of male batterers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to construct an indigenous typology according to the narratives of male perpetrators within the context of Chinese Relationalism and its changing situation within the Taiwanese society. In addition, this study also considered the crime diaries of male batterers, forensic documents, and court statements. To achieve this goal, this study followed the constructivism paradigm and adopted the consensual qualitative research approach method to analyze the text. Twenty four interviewees were invited as participants for semi-structural in-depth interviews; they had committed intimate partner violence and violated domestic law. The results indicated that the interviewees could be divided into four types according to the following five dimensions: Reflect related to Relationalism patriarchy; criticism to role duties of partners; concerns about parenting; alcoholic use; and personality disorder and clinical symptoms. The four types are as follows: Self-modification, following-law and tradition, distress, and fighting-back. Based on the results, practical implications and directions for future research were discussed.

並列關鍵字

chinese cultural change domestic violence typology

參考文獻


李良哲(2000)。維繫婚姻關係重要因素的成人期差異研究。中華心理衛生學刊。13(3),61-87。
林明傑(2009)。家庭暴力案件危險分級與快速評估之進階實務。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊。5(2),305-316。
林明傑、沈勝昂(2004)。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊。17(2),67-92。
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2012)。從傳統華人貞節觀念探討男性殺妻。本土心理學研究。38,43-100。
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2013)。失根的大樹:從文化觀點探究親密暴力殺人者的生命敘說。中華輔導與諮商學報。37,89-124。

被引用紀錄


許家嘉(2017)。從性別看家暴服務處:女性社工服務男性相對人經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703969
邱蘭媚(2015)。男性親密暴力者「忍」之敘事研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614011811
簡亦成(2016)。男性婚姻暴力者夫妻情感之敘說探究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614045447
廖翊茜(2016)。牧師引領婚暴加害人的靈性教誨經驗敘說〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614054822

延伸閱讀