透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.101.95
  • 期刊

中學生的解釋風格、生活壓力和憂鬱之關係:從憂鬱的認知特異質-壓力模式探討

Exploring the Relations between Explanatory Style, Life Stress, and Depression in High School Students: From Cognitive Diathesis-Stress Model Perspective

摘要


本研究以憂鬱的無望感理論(Abramson, Metalsky & Alloy, 1989)爲基礎,考驗解釋風格的認知特異質-壓力模式應用在中學生這個發展階段的適用性,以及自尊在此模式中扮演的角色。共計抽樣1,326人,經篩檢後得1,064份有效資料。 結果摘要如下: 一、生活壓力對中學生的憂鬱症狀具有顯著的預測力,能解釋22.7%的變異量。 二、在控制了生活壓力的影響之後,負向事件通則性解釋風格對中學生的憂鬱症狀之預測,仍具顯著性,處在同樣生活壓力之下的中學生,當面對負向事件時的解釋越傾向通則性,將有較高的機會產生憂鬱的症狀。 三、中學生的負向事件通則性解釋風格和生活壓力兩者在對憂鬱症狀進行預測時,並無顯著的交互作用存在。 四、中學生的自尊和負向事件通則性解釋風格兩者對憂鬱症狀的預測力,在控制了生活壓力的影響之後,仍具顯著性。但沒有支持中學生的自尊、負向事件通則性解釋風格以及生活壓力三者之間,在對憂鬱症狀進行預測時,有顯著的交互作用存在。 五、中學生解釋風格的認知特異質-壓力模式之特定性假設只得到部分支持。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to explore the relations between explanatory style, life stress, and depression in high school students. Based on the hopelessness theory of depression (Abramson, Metalsky, & Alloy, 1989), we test the applicability of the cognitive diathesis-stress model to high school students. Questionnaires were administered to 1,326 high school students, of which 1,064 were valid. All data was analyzed by SPSS, and the main findings of this study were as follows: 1. Life stress was a strong predictor of depressive symptoms, and it could explain the 22.7% variance of depression. 2. Havimg gained control of the influence of life stress, explanatory style was also a strong predictor of depressive symptoms saliently. 3. Explanatory style did not moderate the relationship between life stress and depressive symptoms. 4. With control over the influence of life stress, explanatory style and self-esteem could provide the extra explanation of 22.6% variance of depression. However, a 3-way interaction between life stress, explanatory style, and self-esteem did not gain supported. 5. The specificity hypothesis of cognitive diathesis-stress model was partially supported by the evidence. Discussion and suggestions concerning the future study and the guidance practice for high school students were provided.

參考文獻


吳武典、林幸台、王振德、郭靜姿(1999)。基本人格量表指導手冊。台北:心理。
金珮玲(1991)。血液透析病患的歸因組型與憂鬱-憂鬱性歸因理論的驗証(碩士論文)。台灣大學心理研究所。
高民凱、林清文(2002)。中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究。彰化師大輔導學報。23,131-162。
翁嘉英(1997)。失能性慢性病患之自我評價歷程與自尊感對其初期因應策略的影響(博士論文)。台灣大學心理學研究所。
張素凰()。,未出版。

被引用紀錄


Hung, S. C. (2011). 國中學生逆境經驗與心理健康關係之探究 [master's thesis, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2011.00086
陳姿臻(2009)。屏東地區國中學生生活壓力主觀感受與自我生命意義感受之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2009.00288
簡聿彣(2018)。國中生幽默風格對主觀生活壓力與身心健康之調節作用〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DEPC.004.2018.F02
何佩玟(2010)。老人旅遊態度、生活壓力與旅遊動機相關之研究-以台北市長青學苑為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2611201410141876
李雅帆(2014)。高中職餐飲技術科實用技能學程學生生活壓力、 社會焦慮與社會適應之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0018-2307201423591200

延伸閱讀