透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.70.203
  • 期刊

從百家爭鳴到隱聚山林:辯證台灣「主權」獨立路線的分與合

An Argumentation of Taiwan's International Status-From Diversified Thoughts to Hidden Aspirations

摘要


隨著政權更迭,現階段有關台灣主體意識的理念成為執政下的噤聲,一時間相關台灣主體、本土論述邁入寒蟬效應,盛況不再,如同隱聚山林一般。其所凸顯的是民眾對現實政治的考量外,還加上各家路線的紛紜雜沓、莫衷一是,無法凝聚共識,使致弱化論述的力道。爰本文試圖藉由梳理「台灣為主體」論述的脈絡,在解釋與呈現各路線、流派間之話語力量同時,強調各家理論之間雖存有歧異但卻具有可通約性(commensurability)特質。文章透過相關台灣地位論述與法律地位問題的探討,其目的不在於各家言論的良窳分析,而在藉以重新思考並建構台灣主體的價值。

並列摘要


With the change of regime, the idea of consciousness on Taiwan under the ruling party's policy becomes such a taboo subject. Unlike the DDP government's promotion and contention, consciousness of Taiwan and discourse of localization/subjectivity have altered towards the decline of discussion at this stage. It shows that people have no choice to face political considerations and cannot to reach a consensus on the diverse discourses. Hence, this article re-examines an analysis of the prospects for the discourse of subjectivity on Taiwan. The article suggests that although each theory and each discourse makes a different argument about how it works to enhance Taiwan consciousness, they still have the same commensurability among them. Meantime, the purpose of the article is not judging the discourse but re-examining the value of Taiwan by exploring a discussion of the relevance of the status of Taiwan and its legal entity.

參考文獻


〈中華民國有三種〉,2011年10月14日《自由時報》,<http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/Service/editorial/news.php?engno=531436&day=2011-10-14>。
〈日代表:台灣地位未定,外交部召見抗議〉,2009年5月2日《自由時報》,<http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2009/new/may/2/today-p6.htm>。
〈阮銘專欄─兩個台灣的命運〉,《男方快報網》,<http://www.southnews.com.tw/specil_coul/Yuan/Yuan_00/00099.htm>。
〈國慶談話〉,2011年10月11日《自由時報》,<http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/oct/11/today-t1.htm>。
〈認同是中國人正在台灣疏失〉,《中時電子報》,<http://news.chinatimes.com/wantdaily/11052101/112011012100524.html>。

延伸閱讀