清華六〈鄭武夫人規孺子〉補證

〈鄭武夫人規孺子〉收錄於《清華大學藏戰國竹簡》第陸輯，本文論考當前學界之相關論爭，認為鄭武公「處衛三年」一事，應以「涉衛拓疆」的可能性最大；並據鄭莊公之生年及簡文「不見其室」之記載，推斷鄭武公「居衛」的時間。其次，針對簡文所錄「埶、卑御、勤力、𢎹、妬」五種人臣加以補證，認為「勤力」當解釋為「以力見寵之人」，藉以解決此處分歧的斷句問題。最後，指出簡文中武姜規訓莊公之言與《尚書．冏命》穆王告誡伯冏之語的對應性，並加歸納二篇在語序、用字等四點雷同之處，進一步申論〈鄭武夫人規孺子〉與〈冏命〉的關係，提供重新思考簡文之文獻來源及其與《尚書》之源流關係的一種可能。

關鍵字

鄭武夫人規孺子；處衛三年；勤力；五類臣；尚書

並列摘要

"Zheng Wu Fu Ren gui ru zi" is included in the Chu Bamboo Slips of the Warring States Period Collected in Tsing Hua University, Vol.6. This study examines the relevant debates in the current academic circles, and argues that Zheng Wu Gong's "Three years in the Wei" is most likely to "involve the guards and expand the frontier". Based on the birth year of Duke Zheng Zhuang and the record of "not seeing his room" in the brief text, we can infer the time when Duke Wu of Zheng was "in captivity". Secondly, this study provides further evidence for the five kinds of people and ministers recorded in the brief text, "Xie shu, Bei yu, Qin li, She yu and Mei du", and suggests that "Qin li" should be interpreted as "one who sees favor with strength", so as to resolve the segmentation issue here. Finally, this study points out the correspondence between Wu Jiang's words on the discipline of Zhuang Gong in the Jianwen and King Mu's warning for Bo Jian in Shangshu "Jianming", pinpoints the four similarities in the word order and word usage, and further discusses the relationship between "Zheng Wu Fu Ren Gui Ru Zi" and "Jianming". This study sheds fresh light on the source of literature in Jianwen and its relationship with the origin of Shangshu.