大專籃球聯賽選手之心理堅韌性心理堅韌性、特質性焦慮、壓力因應策略與運動倦怠量表編制

The Scale Development of Mental Toughness, Trait Anxiety, Stress Coping Strategies and Sport Burnout of College Basketball Player

楊欽城(Chin-Cheng Yang) ； 柳立偉(Li-Wei Liu) ； 鄒智盛(Jhih-Sheng Zou)

《運動休閒餐旅研究》 10卷4期 (2015/12) Pp. 79-105

https://doi.org/10.29429/JSLHR.201512_10(4).05

摘要

本研究目的旨在編製適合大專籃球選手之心理堅韌性、特質性焦慮、壓力因應策略與運動倦怠之量表。研究對象為102 學年度大專籃球聯賽之選手，所得資料經統計分析後，結果顯示：心理堅韌性量表包含「積極奮鬥」、「抗壓性」、「忍受傷痛」三個構面22 個題項，累積解釋總變異量為67.32%；特質性焦慮量表包含9 個題項，累積解釋總變異量為65.83%；壓力因應策略量表包含「針對問題」、「針對情緒」及「逃避」三個構面15 個題項，累積解釋總變異量為53.58%；運動倦怠量表包含「情緒與身體的耗竭」及「對運動貶價」兩個構面7 個題項，累積解釋總變異量為82.07%；各分量表之Cronbach's α 介於.808~.937，顯示本量表具有可接受的建構效度與信度。接著採驗證性因素分析考驗量表假設模式之適配程度，心理堅韌性量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=579、χ^2/df=3.06、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.053、RMSEA=0.068、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.79、PGFI=0.67)，特質性焦慮量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.56、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.022、RMSEA=0.075、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.56、PGFI=0.50)，壓力因應策略量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度，運動倦怠量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ2=32.86、χ2/df=2.53、GFI=0.98、SRMR=0.018、RMSEA=0.058、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.61、PGFI=0.50)。本量表可提供未來研究大專籃球運動做為參考。

關鍵字

大專籃球選手 ； 心理堅韌性 ； 特質性焦慮 ； 壓力因應策略 ； 運動倦怠

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to weave to mental toughness, trait anxiety, stress coping strategies and sport burnout questionnaire for a college basketball players. The subjects were for college basketball leagues players in the school year 102. The data through statistical analysis, The results indicated: Mental toughness questionnaire contains ＂active struggle＂, ＂resistance to stress,＂ and ＂endure the pain,＂ 22 questions of the three factors, the cumulative total explained variance of 67.32%; Trait anxiety questionnaire contains 9 questions, the cumulative total explained variance of 65.83%; stress coping strategiesquestionnaire contains, ＂for the problem, ＂ ＂for the emotional,＂ and ＂evade,＂ 15 questions of the three factors, the cumulative total variance explained was 53.58%; Sport burnoutquestionnaire contains ＂emotional/physical exhaustion of burnout ＂ and ＂devaluation of sport ＂ 7 questions of the two factors, the cumulative total variance explained was 82.07%; The questionnaire demonstrated sound discrimination, validity, and reliability; Then, using confirmatory factor analysis ethod was used to measure the goodness of fit of the model. The results displayed questionnaire of mental toughness has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=579、χ^2/df=3.06、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.053、RMSEA=0.068、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.79、PGFI=0.67); The results, as amended, displayed questionnaire of trait anxiety has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.56、GFI=0.97、 SRMR=0.022、RMSEA=0.075、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.56、PGFI=0.50); The results, as amended, displayed questionnaire of stress coping strategies has goodness of fit of the model (for the problem: χ^2=56.47、χ^2/df=2.46、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.030、RMSEA=0.057、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.63、PGFI=0.50; for the emotional: After the mode identification shows ＂The Model is Saturated, the Fit is Perfect; evade: After the mode identification shows ＂The Model is Saturated, the Fit is Perfect); The results displayed questionnaire of Sport burnout has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=32.86、χ^2/df=2.53、GFI=0.98、SRMR=0.018、RMSEA=0.058、 NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.61、PGFI=0.50). This questionnaire can be provided for college basketball for future research as a reference.

並列關鍵字

college basketball ； mental toughness ； trait anxiety ； stress coping strategies ； sport burnout

參考文獻

()。

吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式AMOS 的操作與應用。臺北市:五南圖書。

吳穌、林紀玲(2004)。運動員焦慮量表編製。運動知識學報。6，45-57。

呂青山(2010)。大專籃球選手運動目標取向、運動員訓練能力與運動員自信心來源模式之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊。9，105-120。

林文山(2004)。國小躲避球運動員的賽前狀態焦慮、因應策略與運動表現的關係。國立台北師範學院體育學系。