透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.189.85
  • 期刊

高教國際化下通識學分型華語課程架構分析與改進之研究

A Study on Analyzing the Content of Curriculum Structure of Mandarin Courses for International Students in General Education of Universities in Taiwan

摘要


在高教國際化的趨勢之下,正規學制的外籍學位生人數持續增長,華語文能力亦為影響在臺留學生適應高教環境的重要因素之一,而正規學制下的學分型華語課,普遍具有混程度、大班課、低時數、低密度等不利於華語作為第二語言學習的課程性質,然目前關於大學學分型華語課,仍缺乏可供課程制度修訂參考之系統性研究,因此,本文主要透過文件分析法,分析各公立大學網頁公告之華語課程相關法規制度與課程架構,以檢視學分型華語課實施現況與問題,並輔以個案訪談,從外籍學習者、華語教師以及參與課程制度修定的行政人員等多方視角,探討可能的方向與策略。研究結果,首先就課程制度面提出修課規定、認抵範疇以及抵免門檻等建議,其次就課程架構面的課程類別、最低學分、分級級數等提出建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research was to review the planning and implementation of Chinese language courses for international students in General Education in public universities in Taiwan. By analyzing the course regulation, the Chinese language courses are classified and compared between different universities. Firstly, the weak point of current fundamental course regulation of Chinese language courses is discussed. Secondly, the rationality between the academic credits and the curriculum objectives of current courses is analyzed. According to the content analysis and case interviews, the results show that the Chinese language courses of most public universities have set up a general regulation for foreign degree-seeking students. However, they have not taken the differences in competency and learning needs of Chinese among students from China, overseas Chinese students, and other international students into considerations. The curriculum structure of the courses is mostly under compulsory courses. Only a few universities offer a general liberal art courses for foreign students in accordance wtih their Chinese language skills. The total compulsory academic credits range from 2 to 24 credits. And most of them were 2 to 6 credits. There's a large gap between universities. The common problem of the courses include low course hours, optimized grading system to correspond to the teaching objectives. Lastly, some suggestions about curriculum development and curriculum framework are offered.

參考文獻


王靖婷:〈大學國文教學面面觀: 相關研究之回顧與展望〉,《通識學刊:理念與實務》,第1 卷,第4 期,2009,頁139-171。
吳清山、王令宜:〈公立大學通識教育課程架構內涵分析與改進之研究〉,《課程與教學》,第20 卷,第1 期,2017,頁1-23。
孫貴珠:〈大學國文通識化課程規劃與教材取向之商榷反思〉,《通識學刊:理論與實務》,第2 卷,第2 期,2013,頁28-29。
陳秋蘭:〈大學通識英文課程實施現況調查〉,《長庚人文社會學報》,第3 卷,第2 期,2010,頁253-274。
黃榮村:〈從國際化觀點展望臺灣二十一世紀的教育〉,《國家政策季刊》,第2卷,第3 期,2003,頁1-26。

延伸閱讀