透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.32.86
  • 期刊

國中學生家長管教子女在校偏差行為法制義務指標與權重之研究

The Study of The Legal Obligation Indicators and Weight System of Public Junior High School Parents for Discipline Their Children's Deviation Behavior in School

摘要


學校對學生偏差行為之管教措施與學生身心安全及學習品質密切相關,而獲得學生家長合法充分之支持,係影響學校教育人員有效行使管教權之重要因素。因此,本研究第一階段先透過文獻探討歸納家長管教子女在校偏差行為法制義務之向度與指標架構,繼以問卷調查法了解140位公立國中學校教育人員對架構內涵之適切性與偏好後,建構出「家長參與之義務」、「家長配合管教之義務」及「家長違反參與或配合管教義務之責任」等三個向度及14個法制義務指標。其次第二階段再以層級分析法調查專家群體(包含教育、司法與行政機關人員)對三個向度與法制義務指標之相對權重。研究結果顯示:在三個向度中,以「家長參與之義務」之權重值最高(.485),而在法制義務指標中,以「參與導師或行政處室主管約談」整體權重值居首(.192),且學校教育人員及專家群體均傾向制訂家長管教子女在校偏差行為法制義務時,應以「家長參與之義務」為優先考量。

並列摘要


The disciplinary measurement of students' deviation behavior in school is highly related with students' mental and physical security and their learning quality. Obtaining legal and sufficient support from parents is an essential factor for educators in school to exercise disciplinary authority efficiently. Therefore, the first step of the study was to induce the legal obligation indicators and weight system by literature review. And then, the questionnaire survey was conducted to comprehend 140 public junior high school educators' opinions and preference to the adequacy of the built structure and content. The obligation of parent engagement, cooperation and the duty of parent violating the obligation of engagement or cooperation were constructed as three dimensions after the questionnaire survey, and 14 legal obligation indicators were emerged. The second step of the study was to implement the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to explore the comparative weight of the three dimensions and 14 indicators in professional community, including educators, judicial officials, and administrators. The results were as follows: in the three dimensions, the highest weight went to "the obligation of parent engagement" (.485), and in the 14 indicators, the highest weight went to "the obligation of engaging in the meeting with homeroom teacher or school administrators" (.192). Besides, educators in school and the professional community both tended to place the priority of "the obligation of parent engagement" ahead when formulating the legal obligation of parents in disciplining their children's deviation behavior in school.

參考文獻


王以仁、王聲偉(2008)。中輟生的問題成因與介入策略。教育研究月刊。172,95-107。
王中興(2009)。現行公立國民中學管教學生法制之研究(碩士論文)。國立台東大學教育學系。
余博文(2002)。國中學生偏差行為輔導與管教成效之研究─以嘉義縣國民中學為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
吳明隆(2013)。班級經營:理論與實務。台北:五南。
吳 庚(2003)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北市:三民。

延伸閱讀