本研究之目的在於探討參加2002年亞運會與2003年全運會男子競技體操賽,晉級雙槓項目決賽的16位選手,所實施的整套動作內容,運用影片觀察法及以描述統計進行分析,本研究獲得結果如下: 一、亞運會及全運會選手在雙槓項目中所完成的動作皆以第Ⅰ、Ⅲ類型動作居多。全運會選手在整套動作的實施未能達到規則中的基本要求,如各類型動作的難度要求、10個基本動作數量等。 二、全還會選手完成的D級以上難度動作種類少,且實施的次數亦少,而亞運會選手實施的D級以上難度動作種類及次數都多,兩者在單獨動作加分部份有相當大的差距。 三、全運會選手在連接動作加分的次數及加分的總合,均少於亞運會選手,相較之下呈現出大幅度落後的情形。
The purpose of this study is to analysis and compared parallel bars apparatus finals in 2003 National Sports games in Taiwan and 2002 Asia Sports Game. After review the record and analysis the parallel bars apparatus finals can draw conclusions by analysis result: 1. In both Asian Games and National Games meeting, most gymnastics acted element group Ⅰ and Ⅲ at parallel bars apparatus. In National games, gymnastics' amount of exercise fails reach to rule basic request. Such as all sorts of element difficulty requests and 10 basic elements in an exercise. 2. Gymnastics in 2003 National Games have fewer performance above D-parts difficulty and frequency, but in 2002 Asia games, it is easy to see gymnastics performance above D-parts difficulty. Therefore, both will increase the range of score in an exercise and single element Bonus Points. 3. Gymnastics in 2003 National Games' Bonus Points for connections and total Bonus Points in an exercise are less than Asian Games Gymnastics.