2019年世界競技體操錦標賽男子團體決賽臺灣與奪牌國家表現之優劣勢比較分析

The Advantages and Weakness Analysis in Taiwan and the Medalists During the 2019 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships Men's Team Final

陳智郁(Chih-Yu Chen) ； 陳光輝(Kuang-Hui Chen) ； 陸康豪(Kang-Hao Lu) ； 湯文慈(Wen-Tzu Tang)

《運動教練科學》 64期 (2021/12) Pp. 27-40

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.202112_(64).0003

摘要

目的：本研究目的為瞭解臺灣選手與俄羅斯、中國及日本選手在2019年世界競技體操錦標賽（以下簡稱為世錦賽）男子團體決賽動作分值、難度分總分、各項目實施得分與實施得分總分之變化，藉此找出臺灣與優秀國家差異所在。方法：研究對象為參與2019年世錦賽男子團體決賽的俄羅斯、中國、日本及臺灣男子競技體操選手，透過獨立樣本單因子變異數分析（one-way analysis of variance）來考驗五個項目動作分值、六個項目實施得分，並以描述性統計觀察難度分總分與實施得分總分。結果：2019年世錦賽男子團體決賽俄羅斯、中國及日本選手僅在雙槓項目動作分值皆顯著高於臺灣選手；臺灣選手五個項目上的難度分總分皆低於奪牌國家；六個項目的實施得分則未達顯著差異；實施得分總分僅在吊環與跳馬項目低於奪牌國家。結論：臺灣選手在雙槓項目第二與第三動作組別分值與奪牌國家有明顯落差，應可藉由動作延伸及變化達到提升至較高動作分值；臺灣選手在實施得分表現已具備相對優勢。

關鍵字

晉級 ； 動作分值 ； 動作組別 ； 實施得分 ； 團體總分

並列摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study were to investigate the effective score, cumulative difficulty score (D score), execution score (E score) of each apparatus, and the cumulative E score between Taiwan, Russia, China, and Japan in the 2019 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships Men's Team Final, and to examine the difference between Taiwan's team and other elite international gymnasts. Methods: The participants of this research included the team members of Taiwan, Russia, China, and Japan in the 2019 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships Men's Team Final. The independent one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the effective score in five apparatus and E score in six apparatus. The descriptive statistics were applied for the cumulative D and E scores, respectively. Results: For the result of parallel bars apparatus in the 2019 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships, it showed that the effective score of Taiwan team was significantly lower than Russia, China, and Japan in the Men's Team Finals. The cumulative D scores of Taiwanese gymnasts in five apparatus were lower than the winners. However, for all six apparatus, there was no significant difference in E score between Taiwan and other countries. The cumulative E scores in rings and vaulting apparatus of Team Taiwan were lower than other elite countries. Conclusion: The major finding of this study is a big gap in parallel bars' effective score, especially for the element group II and group III between Taiwan and other elite teams. Therefore, it is possible to rapidly increase the D score by extending and varying the skills. Taiwanese gymnasts are superior in the performance on E score to others.

並列關鍵字

promotion ； effective score ； element groups ； execution score ； team score

參考文獻

林高正（2017）。以國際評分規則週期概念比較世錦賽及奧運會男子競技體操單項決賽分值表現—以 2013 ∼ 2016 年版為例。運動教練科學，47，79-87。doi:10.6194/scs.2017. 47.08。

林高正、陳智郁、陳光輝（2017）。世界競技體操錦標賽男子團體競賽成績分析。運動教練科學，45，45-53。doi:10.6194/scs.2017.45. 05。

俞智贏（2006）。從新規則的修定探討男子體操訓練方法的因應。中華體育季刊，20(2)，86-91。doi:10.6223/qcpe.2002.200606.1210。

陳光輝、王明鴈、高明鋒（2005）。2002 年亞運會與 2003 年全運會男子競技體操選手雙槓項目整套動作內容之比較分析。國立體育學院論叢，16(3)，305-318。doi:10.6591/JPES. 2005.12.25。

陳光輝、王明鴈、陳銘堯（2008）。影響男子競技體操評分規則中 A、B 分高低的主要因素探討。中華體育季刊，22(4)，119-124。doi:10.6223/qcpe.2204.200812.1714。