透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.237.122
  • 期刊

從參加促進者訓練談促進性溝通的爭議

The Issues of Facilitated Communication based on the Experience of Attending a Facilitator Workshop

摘要


國際輔助溝通學會在 2014 年正式宣布不推薦在實務上應用促進性溝通,但仍有不少倡議者提倡此方法。筆者們藉參加美國雪城大學舉辦的促進者研習經驗,提出五點爭議並進行相關討論,這些爭議課題包括:FC 是輔助溝通或是指導方式、FC 訊息的可靠性、促進者的角色與功能、FC的適用性、特殊教育服務可否納入 FC。

並列摘要


Facilitated communication (FC) was officially not recommended for use in clinical practice by the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) in 2014. Based on the experience gained attending a workshop for facilitators at Syracuse University, the authors proposed five issues for further consideration: whether FC is a form of AAC or a kind of coaching method, authorship of message, the roles of the facilitator, when if FC should be selected, and if FC is a viable option for services in special education.

參考文獻


李明洋(2012)。談促進溝通訓練的歷史及其給予臺灣的啟示。國小特殊教育。54,13-22。
李明洋(2012)。促進溝通訓練相關議題之探討。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。2012,233-256。
官育文(2015):輔助性文字溝通:口語表達困難者的有效溝通策略。取自:http://rett.org.tw/download/ 輔助性文字溝通- 官育文老師.pdf
教育部(2008)。特殊教育發展報告書。臺北:教育部。
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association(1994).Facilitated communication: Technical report.,未出版.

延伸閱讀