合作學習與傳統學習在排球低手傳球學習成效之研究

Cooperative Learning and Traditional Learning on the Volleyball Under-Hand Pass Learning Effectiveness

陳春安(Chun-An Chen) ； 熊明禮(Ming-Lee Hsiung)

《大專體育學術專刊》 95年度 (2006/04) Pp. 88-92

https://doi.org/10.6695/AUES.200604_95.0016

摘要

本研究的主要目的在於瞭解合作學習與傳統學習於體育課之排球低手傳球教學學習成效的差異情形。研究對象為南台科技大學94學年度第一學期四技一年級96名男學生。其研究方法為在實驗教學前先進行排球低手傳球前測兩次，將49名受試者成績依平均數的高、中及低，以每小組4－6人的異質方式 分配在合作學習；其餘47名則分配在傳統學習。本研究經過四週的實驗教學後再進行低手傳球後測，將成績以t-test及單因子共變數分析等統計方法進行分析。研究所獲結果如下：一、合作學習在排球低手傳球具顯著的學習成效。二、傳統學習在排球低手傳球具顯著的學習成效。三、合作學習在排球低手傳球的學習成效顯著高於傳統學習。

關鍵字

合作學習 ； 傳統學習 ； 學習成效

並列摘要

The goal of this study was to contrast the differences of the physical education programs arranged both in cooperative learning and traditional learning. A total of 96 STUT students were arranged to pre-test twice before the volleyball under-hand pass learning experiment, of which 49 were in the cooperative learning group, and 47 were in the traditional learning group. The 49 students in cooperative group were further divided into smaller teams heterogeneously according to their mean evaluations. There was an average of 4 to 6 students in every team. Learning effectiveness of these students were evaluated after 4 weeks of the volleyball under-hand pass learning experiment by using t-test and ANCOVA. The results were summarized as follows: 1. The learning effectiveness of volleyball under-hand pass was salient in cooperative learning group. 2. The learning effectiveness of volleyball under-hand pass was salient in traditional learning group. 3. The learning effectiveness of cooperative learning group was salient higher than traditional learning group in volleyball under-hand pass learning.

並列關鍵字

cooperative learning ； traditional learning ； learning effectiveness