透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.189.247
  • 學位論文

合作學習融入運動教育模式在高中生排球學習成效之研究

Research in the learning effects of Cooperation melts into Sports Education model on volleyball in senior high school student

指導教授 : 林靜萍
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


合作學習融入運動教育模式在高中生排球學習成效之研究 中華民國九十七年六月 研 究 生 邱稚瑋 指導教授 林靜萍 中文摘要 誘發學生學習動機及營造良好的班級氣氛是提升學習者運動參與中不可獲缺的一環,本研究主要目的是探討以合作學習觀念融入運動教育模式的課程(實驗組)對高中生在排球項目的學習效果、學習動機、班級氣氛與運動比賽表現並與運動教育模式(控制組)進行比較;實驗組41名學生前四週實施合作學習教學,後六週則進行運動教育模式;控制組41名學生實施十週的運動教育模式教學。二組學生在教學前後分別施測「排球認知測驗」、「體育課學習動機與班級氣氛調查表」、「排球發球測驗」、運動比賽表現評量(GPAI),所得資料以相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗進行統計分析顯著水準訂在α=.05,結論如下: 一、實驗組與控制組在高中學生的排球認知表現、技能表現、班級學習動機與班級氣氛、運動比賽表現等方面,均能有效提升學習效果。二、兩組在高中學生排球認知表現沒有差異。三、兩組在高中學生技能表現兩者沒有差異。四、實驗組與控制組對高中學生在學習動機沒有差別,但實驗組在班級氣氛構面上優於控制組。五、實驗組與控制組在運動比賽表現上,實驗組優於控制組。除合作學習之融入之外,本研究亦建議未來在運動教育模式的實施上亦可結合其他教學策略,如理解式教學等,以進一步探討其在各層面之學習效果。 關鍵詞:合作學習融入運動教育模式、排球、學習效果

並列摘要


Research in the learning effects of Cooperation melts into Sports Education model on volleyball in senior high school students Master’s Thesis, 2008.6 Chiou Chih -Wei Advisor: Lin Ching Ping Abstract Encouraging students’ learning motivation and creating satisfactory classroom climate were the most important elements for promoting sports learning. The purpose of this study was to compare Cooperation Learning melts into Sports Education model volleyball course with Sports Education model volleyball course about learning effects, learning motivation, classroom climate and Game Performance. There were 41 students in experiment group received cooperation learning in four weeks, then received Sports Education model in six weeks. The control group were 41 students received ten weeks Sports Education model. These two groups were taking pre-test and post-test in volleyball cognitive, volleyball serve skill, learning motivation and classroom climate and GPAI(Game Performance Assessment Instrument). The data was gathered and analyzed with Pair T-test and T-test, significant level was α.05. The conclusions were as follows: 1. The experimental group and the control group could effectively promote students’ cognitive, skill, learning motivation, classroom climate and game performance. 2. There was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in cognitive. 3. There was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in skill. 4. There was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in learning motivation, but the classroom climate was significant difference between experimental group and control group, experimental group was higher than control group. 5. The game performance was significant difference between experimental group and control group, experimental group was higher than control group. Besides the Cooperation Learning melts into Sports Education model, This were also suggested that unifying other teaching strategies in the Sports Education model in future, like Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU). Further discuss learning effect in various level. Key words: Cooperation Learning melts into Sports Education model, Volleyball, learning effects.

參考文獻


王千倖(1997)。合作學習。師友,364,34-38。
邱稚瑋(2007)。合作學習教學融入高中體育課程之看法。學校體育,17(5),10-15。
林建宏(1997)。體育合作學習效果之探討。中華民國大專院校八十六年體育學術研討會專刊(上),471-482。
郭滿洲、曾智豐(2003)。運動教育模式與傳統體育教學對國小學童自我概念與人際關係影響之研究。92年度體育學術研討會專刊。
黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北市:東華書局。

被引用紀錄


張鴻毅(2010)。在部落格合作競爭學習中,學習者學習焦慮、學習動機對學習成就影響之研究-以自我效能為調節變項〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315191970
陳昭宇(2012)。探討BBL取向體育教學成效及其對教師實務知識的影響〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315280942
王泓翔(2012)。合作學習對國中二年級體育低成就學生籃球學習成效與同儕關係之影響〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613520364
盧瑞珍(2013)。合作學習對學生學習成效影響之後設分析-以2005至2012年之學位論文與期刊為範圍〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418030119

延伸閱讀