環保科技園區政策執行之研究：以高雄園區為例

環保科技園區是環保署在二○○二年開始推動的競爭型計畫，經由各縣市政府提案爭取與審查後，最後由高雄縣、花蓮縣、臺南縣與桃園縣獲得通過補助設置執行。值得注意的是，根據截至二○一一年的相關資料發現，各園區的執行成效存在很大的差異，而以高雄環保科技園區最好，花蓮縣則敬陪末座。為了探究此一政策執行上的差異，本研究採用文獻分析與深度訪談，以深入政策形成的脈絡。研究架構則修改自Goggin等人於一九九○年所發表的第三代政策執行：府際間政策執行溝通模式，以探討中央（環保署）與地方（高雄縣）政府的互動，以及高雄縣政府的決策結果和能力，對於高雄環保科技園區在政策執行成效之影響。高雄縣市政府的決策能力將影響政策的執行，並與政策執行的成效形成正比。高雄縣政府自身的執行能力的具體作為，反映在突破傳統公部門的做法，積極主動爭取外部資源與支援。其次，設立組織內部的「協調、整合」機制，定期召開副首長聯合會議，做為所有涉及跨局處溝通與整合障礙的重要機制。最後，進行服務流程再造，設立聯合服務單一窗口及縮短申請流程時間，使得高雄環保科技園區進行成功的招商。

關鍵字

環保科技園區；政策執行；組織再造

並列摘要

Environmental Science and Technology Park (ESTP) is a project founded by Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) in 2002. Through a competitive process of selection, Kaohsiung County, Hualien County, Tainan County and Taoyuan County were chosen as sites of implementation. It is worth noting that, as the data collected in 2011 revealed, there is a big difference in the effectiveness of the implementation of these four parks. Kaohsiung ESTP is the best and Hualien County is in last place. To explore the differences in policy implementation, literary review and in-depth interview methods were used to analyze the context of policy formation. Research framework is modified the theory of ＂the communication model of intergovernmental policy implementation＂, which was proposed from Goggin et al. in 1990, to explore policy formation process and interactions between Central government (EPA) and Local government (Kaohsiung) and the capacity and effectiveness of Kaohsiung ESTP in policy implementation. The study has found that the decision-making ability of the local (county and city) governments affect the implementation of the policy greatly and is in proportion to the effectiveness of policy implementation.

並列關鍵字

Environmental Science and Technology Parks ； Policy Implementation ； Organizational Restructuring

國際替代計量

環保科技園區政策執行之研究：以高雄園區為例

全文下載

主題瀏覽