「轉依」二義之研究

高崎直道與史密豪生對「轉依」（asraya-paravrtti、asraya-parivrtti）二義曾有它們是否代表兩種理論的爭論，本論文主張回到轉依二義的哲學涵義的區分，主張可以區分「轉依的種子等之消滅、活動停止、非顯現之佛教認識論的側面」和「轉依的依之全體之變貌的轉依的佛教存有論的側面」。本論文並且回到如來藏說與唯識思想的交涉來看待轉依二義的問題，重新審察轉依二義的爭論，並就真諦唯識學的通二分的轉依說的理論，重新探討轉依二義之交涉的課題的理論深度。

關鍵字

高崎直道；史密豪生；唯識；轉依；如來藏

並列摘要

This article tackles the problem of the two meanings of ＂Fundamental Transformation＂(asraya-paravrtti, asraya-parivrtti). Firstly, this article reexamines the dispute about the ＂Fundamental Transformation＂ between Jikido Takasaki and Lambert Schmithausen. Secondly, I use the philosophical interpretation about the epistemological dimension and the ontological dimension of ＂Fundamental Transformation＂ to illuminate the meaning of different expressions of asraya-paravrtti and asraya-parivrtti. Finally, I come back to the context of the interweaving between tathagata-garbha and vijnaptimatrata to reexamines the dispute about the ＂Fundamental Transformation＂.

並列關鍵字

Jikido Takasaki ； Lambert Schmithausen ； Vijnanavada ； Fundamental Transformation ； Tathagata-garbha

參考文獻

高崎直道(1989)。如來藏思想Ⅱ。京都:法藏館。

Google Scholar

葉阿月。哲學與文化。

Google Scholar

橫山紘一(1984)。唯識哲學。京都:平樂寺書店。

Google Scholar

Florin Giripesce Sutton(1991)。Existence and Enlightenment in the Lańkâvatâtra-sŭtra-Study in the Ontology and Epistemology of the Yogâcâra School of Mahâyâna Buddhism。State University of New York Press。