專案資料蒐集與管控模式之研究─以公共工程標案管理系統為例

A Study on Data Collection and Control Model for Project – the Public Construction Management Information System

周壽榮(Sou-Jung Chou)

指導教授 ： 曾惠斌

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2012年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02266

摘要

公共工程主辦機關應謹慎的掌握公共工程標案執行進度及預算。但很少公共工程主辦人員重視整體機關正確資料掌控。有鑑於此，建立公共工程管理系統，以簡單明瞭且快速的系統功能來掌握公共工程執行狀況的機制，並提供異常監測機制實有其必要性。本研究藉由系統建立的過程，探討公共工程進度管理及異常監測之方法，以作為政府對公共工程施政之基本依據。應用關聯式資料庫方式，研析施工過程中資料相關狀況，選定影響公共工程進度之項目，再以線上即時分析進行資料分析，將工程施工狀況提供層級化分析，建立工程管理資料蒐集模式，並確認各項目之相互關係；為驗證影響工程執行之評估項目，採用時序管控方式，進行工程執行資料填報異常之監控，以系統即時提供填報者發覺缺漏資訊，即時提供法令函文規定資訊，尋求解決方式，以防患未然。另外也利用管理機制，來整合異常處理模式、工程績效評估、監測、及知識管理，因而建立一套可支援資料處理、觀察、評估、以及提供管理分析之支援系統，進而能夠提供各層級政府在變遷動態的環境中監測工程的進行狀況，以提昇工程之執行績效。
近年來，公共工程品質相關議題日漸受到重視，工程主管機關藉由施工品質查核及督導以瞭解公共工程品質與執行狀況，以便及早發現缺失並儘速要求，避免錯過最佳改善時機，因此，品質查核的角色也就更加重要。然而，在每次品質查核後，相關品質查核資訊如何完整蒐集，並掌握進度與品質高風險指標，提出一個進度與品質資料分析架構，利用系統蒐集之資料來分析公共工程的執行狀況及品質查核記錄，以獲得各工程之品質風險樣式，同時，也提供這些風險樣式與施工進度異常狀況之間的關聯性，以建構更完整的預測模型。
經由本系統所提供的資訊將可作為政府機關工程管理人員的輔助資訊，進而對主辦機關提出警訊或適當的管理決策，以達到及早預防及早處理的成效。本研究成果歸納如下：
一、建立完整行政體系公共工程施工階段資料蒐集方法。
二、提供各層級政府機關工程施工管控模式。
三、使用各種進度報表及異常分析功能供進度管理。
四、蒐集公共工程之重大影響進度因子資料提供後續研究分析。
五、建構績效評估定量分析資料彙整模式。

關鍵字

公共工程 ； 進度管理 ； 工程標案管理系統 ； 品質查核

並列摘要

The authorities of public construction should control with cautious the schedule performance and budge of public construction tenders. However, very few staff in charge from the authority emphasis on overall controlling of corrects information collection. In view of this, it is necessary to build a public construction management information system, which with simple and fast system function, to control the performance status, and provide anomaly monitoring mechanism. As far as the study method is concerned, this research, through the process of building system, studies a method of performance management and anomaly monitoring for public construction as reference to government administration. The study uses the technologies of relational database (RDB) to analyze the status of related information during the process of construction, selects the items that affect performance, then analyzes data by online analytical processing to provide hierarchical analytical of performance status, therefore establish data collecting model for construction management and confirm the relation among different items. In order to verify the evaluated items that affect the construction, the system adopts timing control to monitor the anomaly when the data of construction performing is filling, provides data filler the real-time information of data incomplete, and rules and regulations for seeking solution as a precautious. In addition, the system also employs management mechanism to integrate the models of handling anomaly, project performance evaluation, monitoring, and knowledge management, thereby to build a back-up system for supporting data management, observation, assessment and provide management analysis, further to enable governments of different levels to monitor the status of construction in a variable environment in order to enhance the performance of implementation.
In recent years, the related issues of construction quality have attracted public attention gradually. By construction quality auditing and supervision, the construction authority can understand the quality and status of implementation for early detecting defect and correction as soon as possible to avoid missing the timing for improvement. Thus, quality audit is more crucial to construction quality; likewise, it is important to collect the related information completely after each quality audit, and know well of the progress and quality of high-risk indicators then to provide a framework to analyze data of progress and quality. The said analytic framework uses the data collected by system to analyze the record of performance status and quality audit to obtain quality risk model of different kinds of construction. Meanwhile, the correlation between these risk models and anomaly of construction will also available for establishing more integrated prediction models.
The information provided by the system can be used as supplementary information to the project manager in government agencies, and then provides the authority with warning or appropriate management decision, in order to achieve the effectiveness of early prevention and early management. The results of this study are summarized as follows:
1. to establish a complete data collection method for administrative system in the phase of public construction.
2. to provide government agencies of all levels a construction management and control model.
3. to provide schedule management by using a variety of tables and anomaly analysis functions.
4. to collect factor information of significant impact on the progress to provide follow-up research and analysis.
5. to build a model for collecting data of the performance evaluation of quantitative analysis.

並列關鍵字

Public Construction ； Schedule Management ； Public Construction Management Information System ； Quality Audits

參考文獻

18.張行道 (2002)「建置公共工程施工績效評估機制」，行政院公共工程委員會。

34.施宗英、陳海雄，2006，「中央行政機關計畫型補助網路化管理之探討」，研考雙月刊，30卷5期。

35.陳志誠（2008）

36.行政院公共工程委員會(2009.9)「公共工程品質查核改進措施」投影片

37.行政院公共工程委員會(2009.3)「品質分析方法與應用」，公共工程品質管理訓練班教材，第二單元(上冊)