本論文以北部某ESPC(Energy Savings Performance Contract)之案例為研究目標,並且以能源分析軟體eQUEST(QUick Energy Simulation Tool)進行大樓整體耗能分析。應用eQUEST建築能源分析軟體於M&V(Measurement and Verification)選項D,最初需經由現場進行資料收集,將資料整理後逐步輸入eQUEST分析軟體內,完成輸入建物資訊,並以建物實際電費單來校正初步模型,最後再以校正後之建物模型,探討建物中因材質設定不同所產生的耗能變化。 結果顯示,予以人員占有率上下50 %之變化,整體耗能變化率介於-0.78 %至1.67 %之間。在照明密度部分顯示出,予以照明密度上下50 %之變化,整體耗能顯示出其變化率介於-30.28 %至31.19 %之間。窗戶材質部分,結果顯示出以三層低輻射玻璃取代一般玻璃會有較好的節能量,整體耗能變化率為-0.71 %。改變建築外殼材質部分,將外牆材質改變為RC結構之牆面後,整體耗能變化率為1.66 %,改變為磚牆後,整體耗能變化率為0.68 %,改變為預鑄板牆後,整體耗能變化率為0.09 %。在簡易模型之部分,由結果可看出在改變建築外殼設置後會影響最終之耗能結果,而逐月份之能耗變化率介於-17.64 %至14.65 %之間。
Taking the case of ESPC (Energy Savings Performance Contract) in the north as the research subjects, this paper analyzes the overall energy consumption of the building with eQUEST (QUick Energy Simulation Tool) software. When applying eQUEST building energy analysis software in option D of M&V (Measurement and Verification), it is necessary to collect the data on-site firstly, and then input the data (such as building shell model, glass material, personnel occupation rate, lighting density, equipment, air conditioning system and energy management scheduling) step by step into the eQUEST software after data sorting. Finally, modify the initial model in accordance with the actual electricity bills of the building, so as to explore the changes in energy consumption due to different material settings based on the modified model. The results show that the rate of change in overall energy consumption is between -0.78 % and 1.67 % given that the personnel occupation rate changes 50 % more or less. In terms of the lighting density, the overall energy consumption has a rate of change from -30.28 % to 31.19 % if the lighting density changes 50 % more or less. Moreover, the relative low energy consumption can be obtained when the general glass is replaced by three-layer glass of low emissivity with an overall energy consumption rate of -0.71 %. After the building shell material is changed into RC structure, the rate of overall energy consumption is 1.66 %, which is 0.68 % when changed into brick wall and 0.09 % when changed into precast wall. In the simple models, it can be learned that the final energy consumption results will be affected after the building shell setting is changed, with a rate change in overall energy consumption between -17.64 % and 14.65 % month after month.