應用量測與驗證選項D之實例分析與其標準作業程序之建立

A Case Study and Establishment of Standard Operating Procedures for the Implementation of Option D in IPMVP

邱鈺欽(Yu-Chin Chiou)

指導教授 ： 柯明村

國立臺北科技大學/機電學院/能源與冷凍空調工程系碩士班/碩士(2011年)

摘要

本論文以北部某辦公大樓之ESPC專案為研究對象，文中提及IPMVP中M&V選項D與LEED中之能源與大氣評價項目可由eQUEST建築能源分析軟體進行節能效益驗證。應用eQUEST建築能源分析軟體於M&V選項D，並撰寫其標準作業程序，經由最初步之現場探勘、資料收集到eQUEST建築能源分析軟體模擬分析、誤差校正及節能量分析。
模擬校正為進行M&V選項D之最重要環節，應考慮實際建築結構、人員占有率、照明、設備、空調系統及能源管理排程等之耗能因素，並視實際狀況配合合理推測來進行誤差修正。調查資料之完整性、模擬人員之軟體熟悉度、全盤性的模擬校正誤差考量均為M&V選項D之重點，以上條件越為完備，可使驗證結果更為可靠。
結果顯示主機部分，模擬計算之主機節能效益為39.23%，實際驗證之主機節能效益為33.32%，模擬節能效益與實際驗證節能效益誤差為+5.91%。水泵部分，模擬計算之水泵節能效益為44.82%，實際驗證水泵節能效益為48.18%，模擬節能效益與實際驗證節能效益誤差為-3.36%。整體節能量評估，模擬計算之整體節能效益為40.71%，實際驗證之整體節能效益為37.72%，模擬節能效益與實際驗證節能效益誤差為+2.99%。經本文案例進行M&V選項D之標準作業程序制定，以利ESPC專案應用選項D方法之順利進行及推動。

關鍵字

M&V選項D ； eQUEST ； LEED ； 標準作業程序 ； 模擬校正

並列摘要

In this thesis, the ESPC project of an office building in Northern Taiwan is taken as the research target. The Option D of M&V and the Energy and Atmosphere Evaluation of LEED mentioned herein can be verified by the eQUEST building energy analysis software for power efficiency findings. This study applies the eQUEST building energy analysis software in the Option D of M&V and composes the standard operation procedures through initial field surveys, data collection to eQUEST simulation building energy analysis software, error correction and power efficiency analysis.
Simulation adjustment is the most essential part of Option D of M&V. It is necessary to consider the actual building structure, personnel share, lighting, equipments, air conditioning and energy management and other factors and to correct the errors based on the real conditions and reasonable speculations. The integrity of survey information, the software familiarity of simulation personnel, the overall consideration of the analog calibration error are all important points of Option D of M & V. More detail completion of the above-mentioned conditions are, the more reliable the verification results can be.
The results show that in the chiller part, the energy saving rate of the simulation calculation is 39.23%, while the chiller energy saving rate of the actual verification is 33.32%. The error between simulation power efficiency rate and actual power efficiency rate is +5.91%.It shows that in the pump part, the energy saving rate of the simulation calculation is 44.82%, while the pump energy saving rate of the actual verification is 48.18%. The error between simulation power efficiency rate and actual power efficiency rate is -3.36%. In the overall assessment, the energy saving rate of the simulation calculation is 40.71, while the power efficiency rate of the actual verification is 37.72%. The error between simulation power efficiency rate and actual power efficiency rate is +2.99%.The standard operation procedures of the Option D of M&V are set to smoothly develop and facilitate the Option D methods of the ESPC project application.

並列關鍵字

Option D of Measurement and Verification ； eQUEST ； LEED ； Standard Operation Procedure ； Simulation adjustment

參考文獻

[2]Efficiency Valuation Organization ，”International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol” ， 2009.

[3]許祐峰，”電費計量基準之建築動態耗能模擬應用”，碩士學位論文，國立臺北科技大學能源與冷凍空調工程系碩士，2007年。

[4]J. K. Kissock ，”A Methodology to Measure Retrofit Energy Savings in Commercial Buildings”，1993.

[5]隋承道，”辦公大樓空調機房以節能績效保證專案改善之效益分析”，碩士學位論文，國立臺北科技大學能源與冷凍空調工程系，2009年。

[6]李建享，”量販店節能技術之研究”，碩士學位論文，國立臺北科技大學能源與冷凍空調工程系，2005年。