- 學位論文
「家的營造」到「社區營造」： 中寮鄉八仙村馬鞍崙仙樂社區921社區重建經驗研究
From Home Making to Community Buildin︰ A Case Study on the Experience of 921 Community Recovery in Ma-An-Lun Village , Chung-Liao , Na-Tou County.
摘要
論文摘要 研究者於地震後兩年進入中寮鄉，協助中寮社區重建的後續工作。當時，中寮鄉災區重建工作在政府、社區、專業者的努力下，已漸漸回復到地震前農村社會生活穩定的狀態，舊有的現象與問題重新浮現，同時也回到鄉村與城市關係原來的狀態，也就是鄉村過度依賴城市。地震後前兩年最主要的工作是協助社區在最短的時間中先穩定下來，而社區穩定後，接續的社區重建工作所面臨的則是社區未來發展問題，包括居民生活、社區永續、經濟產業、農村生態等等議題，因此，接續的社區重建工作是要恢復地方的生機與活力，同時提升地方的生活能力。 然而就近年台灣社區營造的成果看來，社區營造行動多是由外而內，但始終無法碰觸到社區最底層的真實生活，總是進不到家裡與居民的生活發生最直接的關係，致使社區營造延續不易。經過921地震的傷害，災區的房子倒了，「家」需要重建，因此我們有機會從「家的營造」出發，由內而外，延續開展社區營造的工作。 因此本研究以馬鞍崙仙樂社區為社區營造經驗研究之對象，從「家的營造」到「社區營造」，再到「社區產業」，研究者真實紀錄所參與之社區營造的過程，進而檢驗分析社區營造之行動歷程，最後再重新回頭檢視馬鞍崙仙樂社區自921地震發生後，5年多來之災後社區重建工作。以下為研究者參與社區營造行動之體認︰ 一、農村社會中，「家」的領域 二、重建工作必須建立在「家的營造」的基礎上 三、真實社區重建工作的行動歷程 四、社區營造之引動點 期望藉由馬鞍崙仙樂社區之重建經驗的研究與反省，作為後續相關重建工作與社區營造行動之參考依據與省思。
並列摘要
Abstract Two years later the 921 earthquake shook Taiwan, the community recovery works are still undertaken with the efforts from the government, the community and professionals. Taking the study area of Chung-Liao, Na-Tou county, where the author participated in as an example, the most important tasks after the first two years were to help the inhabitants resume the steady life as soon as possible. As the recovery projects evolved, the community has to face the challenges of future development such as living condition, community sustainability, agriculture economy, rural ecology and so on. Therefore, the next stage of community recovery works should focus to generate the local vitality and to empower the living abilities, while some other communities have unfortunately fallen back to the situation just like before the earthquake and the previous phenomena and problems in the rural community such as the dependency of urban area emerged again, Nevertheless, through the experiences of the community development in Taiwan in the past few years, the actions of the community building almost were top down and outside in. Normally, the outside professional teams can hardly reach the real community life and result in the most direct relation with living. After the 921 earthquake, many buildings collapsed, “home” needs to be rebuilt. Therefore, we had an opportunity to expand the community building, which was based on “home making” from inside out. Hence, there is a case study on the experience of 921 community recovery in Ma-An-Lun village, Chung-Liao. The author recorded the participatory process of the community building and analyzed the actions from “home making” to “community building” of the community recovery works from the 921 earthquake taken place and the following five years. After participating in the community building, the author found some important issues from the whole experiences: 1. Recognizing the “home sphere” in the rural society, 2. The recovery working must establish on the base of “home making”, 3. Redefine the action of “real” community recovery, and 4. The empower-point of the community building plays a very important part. Through the study on the experience of the community recovery in Ma-An-Lun village, it can give some perspectives and suggestions for the community building in the future.