透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.172.252
  • 學位論文

合作學習在體育課中不同分組方式對動作技能學習成效與學習動機之影響

The influence of Student's motor skills learning achievement and motivation by using different grouping strategies of Cooperative Learning in Physical Education

指導教授 : 林靜萍
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討合作學習在體育課中使用動作技能S型異質分組、自由分組兩種不同分組方式,是否對籃球技能學習成效與學習動機造成影響,並進一步比較兩種分組方式差異情形。本研究以兩個國中九年級班級,作為研究對象,採用準實驗研究法,以動作技能分組做為控制組、自由分組做為實驗組。研究工具包含ARCS動機量表、籃球技能表現測驗。以SPSS20.0版統計分析軟體進行相關統計處理,α設為 .05。結果發現動作技能分組與自由分組在學習成效中整體技能、運球及傳球有顯著提升,投籃方面皆未達顯著;學習動機方面兩種分組方式在整體上皆有顯著提升。另外,兩種不同分組方式在學習動機與學習成效上無顯著差異。建議在未來教學方面,教師應先建立學生間良好關係,在教學時有時間限制,可使用自由分組方式,使用合作學習教師應適時介入,以及依教學目標選擇合適分組方式;在未來研究設計上可深入探討自由分組之原因,針對不同項目、不同研究對象、教學時間與次數的調整以及使用更多不同分組方式進行比較。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research is to explain whether heterogeneous grouping and self-selected grouping will influence learning effects and motivations while learning basketball skills or not ; moreover, to compare the differences between these two ways of grouping. The participants are 55 students in 9th grade from two classes. The method is experimental research. The experimental group is heterogeneous grouping and the control group is self-selected grouping. The instruments used in this study included ARCS motivation model and Basketball skill test. The study uses the statistical softwere SPSS20 to process the data in which the statistical sigrificance was set at α= .05. The result shows students grouped by both ways made obvious progress in integrated skills, dribbling and passing balls but none in shooting. On the other hand, students all showed high motivation in both methods of grouping while there are no remarkable differences in motivation and achievement between two ways. This study suggests teachers make a good relationship with students. If time is limited, teachers may use self-selected grouping. When using cooperative learning, teachers should involve in, and select an appropriate grouping way according to objectives. The research design can focus on reasons of self-selected grouping, various sports or participants, the frequency of teaching times, and different grouping methods to conduct the study.

參考文獻


熊明禮 (1996)。傳統學習教學法與合作學習教學法在飛盤擲遠教學效果之比較。大專體育,27,48-60。
中文部分
王泓翔 (2012)。合作學習對國中二年級體育低成就學生籃球學習成效與同儕關係之影響 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
王榮暉 (2009)。資訊科技融入體育教學對國小學童學習籃球運球上籃之影響~以混合應用討論區體育教學為例~ (未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮市。
王宗進 (1995)。Mosston’s三種教學形式之教學效果比較研究-以羽球發球為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立體育大學,桃園縣。

延伸閱讀