本研究之主要目的是針對統計課程中的信賴區間單元,設計一套以實驗教學的-探究教學法,並對教學成果進行評量,比較探究教學法與傳統教學法兩者在教學成效之差異與分析。此外,利用教學評量結果對學生在此單元的學習結果進行診斷,並探討兩組學生之學習表現與差異,作為日後在教學上的參考與改進。 本研究之主要內容為設計實驗教學教材,進行施教,並與傳統教學法的教學成效做比較,主要的研究結果如下: (1) 在顯著水準α=0.05下,實施探究教學法的實驗組學生之評量結果優於實施傳統教學法的對照組,且兩組學生在男生的答題表現皆優於女生的答題表現。 (2) 在顯著水準α=0.05下,在概念性知識、程序性知識、與解決問題的能力的教學評量結果上,實驗組學生的表現皆明顯優於對照組。 (3) 在顯著水準α=0.05下,兩組學生在評量試題1-(b)、1-(e)、1-(g)、3-(2)、4-(2)的答對率有顯著差異,即實驗組的答對率顯著大於對照組。 整體而言,分析本研究之結果,實施探究教學法的實驗組之教學成效明顯優於實施傳統教學法的對照組。
The purpose of this study is to design a teaching method for the topic「confidence interval」curriculum unit of high school mathematics course and to explore the differences of learning effects between experimental and traditional teaching methods. Moreover, the evaluation results are adopted to diagnose the student’s learning effects between the two different groups, which could serve as a direction for reference and improvement to future teaching. The teaching effects between the experimental teaching method (experimental group) and the traditional teaching method (control group) were analyzed. The results are listed as follows: (1) The learning effects of the experimental group were significantly better than that of the control group at level α =0.05, also schoolboys are significantly better than schoolgirls in both groups. (2) With regard to the aspects of conceptual knowledge leaning effects, procedural knowledge leaning effects, and applying conceptual and knowledgeable reasoning to solve the problems, the experimental group students was significantly better than that of the control group at level α = 0.05. (3) The percentage of correct answer for the question 1-(b),.1-(e),.1-(g),.3-(2), and 4-(2) of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group at level α = 0.05. In conclusion, the students of experimental group who accepted the experimental teaching method get better teaching effects than those of control group.