透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.42.168
  • 學位論文

情緒假知覺期待與幸福感之關連研究:工作壓力為干擾

The Relationship between the Expectation of Perceived Emotional Leave and Well-Being: Job Stress as Moderators

指導教授 : 劉仲矩
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


所謂的「情緒假」主要是企業提供有薪彈性休假及相關配套活動來達成員工個人負面情緒釋放與壓力紓解,進而提升員工的幸福感。本研究有三個目的:一是了解台灣企業實施情緒假的現況;二是研究員工情緒假知覺期待與幸福感的關聯;三是研究工作壓力對情緒假知覺期待與幸福感的調節作用。 本研究利用質化與量化方法,採取立意抽樣來進行。質化研究中共訪談了2家台灣企業,了解這些公司情緒假制度實施的狀況,並訪談3位人資主管與專員,以及1位董事長,並對個案公司的員工進行問卷調查,共收回54份問卷,而將訪談、蒐集、參與觀察所得的資料分析。研究結果如下: 1.有情緒假這項福利的公司很少,且情緒假的起源來自創辦人的自身的啟發、組織文化背景亦或是產業特性。 2.情緒假知覺期待與幸福感有正向關聯。 3.工作壓力對情緒假知覺期待與幸福感有調節作用。 在管理實務上,認為個案公司透過員工參與福利活動設計,能夠多元化情緒假的活動內涵,能增加員工的幸福感。營造健康職場風氣,以及建構制度及推廣,能提高員工使用率。

並列摘要


“Emotional leave” refers to the paid-off leave or flexible vacation with supporting activities from company. It could help employees to release negative emotion and job stress, and even enhance employee’s happiness. This study has three purposes: First, to understand the current situation of emotional leave in Taiwan business organization; second, to find the relationships between “the expectation of perceived emotional leave” and “well-being”; Third, to define the moderating role of “job stress” on the relationship between “the expectation of perceived emotional leave” and “well-being”. Qualitative method is parallel to the quantitative method. We adopt purposive sampling. 2 Taiwan businesses are using in quantitative method. We use in-depth interview to collection data. The interviewers including 3 HRs and 1 CEO from two companies. With structured questionnaire, 54 employees from these 2 companies were collected. Basing on the all data we have, the results are as follows: 1.We found that the percentage of business organizations which proceeding emotional leave is very low 2. Hierarchical regression analysis shows that “the expectation of perceived emotional leave” has positive effect on “well-being”, and 3. “job stress” moderates the relationship between “the expectation of perceived emotional leave” and well-being. Finally, to put the findings into managerial practices, we suggest that the employees could participate the welfare designing would diversify the content of emotional leave. By means of promoting emotional leave and concept of healthy workplace will prove the employee well-being.

參考文獻


王淑俐(1997)。教師的情緒管理與人際衝突(上)(下)。師友月刊,356,17-20。
江承曉、劉嘉蕙(2008)。青少年壓力調適、情緒管理與心理健康促進之探討。嘉南學報,34,595-607。
林栢章、王精文(2009)。從委外式員工協助方案探討企業員工諮商內容之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,26,47-83。
林惠彥、陸洛、吳珮瑀、吳婉瑜(2012)。快樂的員工更有生產力嗎? 組織支持與工作態度之雙重影響. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 54(4),451-469。
張秋蘭、林淑真(2007)。1600大企業之福利實施與員工福利需求差異探討。人力資源管理學報,7(1),19-40。

被引用紀錄


許玉青(2015)。護理人員工作壓力、幸福感、專業承諾之相關研究-以情緒智力為調節變項〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614022705

延伸閱讀