本文以我國各地方法院於2008年度期間宣判,涉犯政府採購貪瀆弊案之一審裁判書共七十九件為基礎,結合檢調機關於各該案件偵查程序完成後製作之司法實務書類,包括同案檢察單位之起訴書及調查單位之移送書等資料,分析其中偵辦採購貪瀆案件之司法單位屬性、檢調單位移送及起訴涉案人員之統計、審檢單位辦案之偵審期間比較、檢察官及法官求處罪名及刑度之研析、檢調移送起訴犯罪事實與法院判決結果之差異、被訴人員背景及遭求處罪名之研究、採購程序中違背相關法規之時期及型態等。研究主要發現有:政府採購弊案之採購時程以「開標時期」最多、採購承辦人員兼具雙重優越地位對採購弊案具強大影響力、檢調政風本位主義無法遏阻採購弊案發生及公務員涉犯採購貪瀆在司法程序之差別待遇等結論。本文最後提出三點建議:必須建置政府採購之標準作業程序、貪污治罪條例應該減輕刑責或回歸一般刑法適用及應儘速落實刑事妥速審判法等之法律程序正義要求,並提供政府採購作業之違失情節供採購承辦人員參考。
This article is based on seventy nine criminal cases involving government procurement corruption, and sentenced in the first instance in district court in 2008. In addition the study examined the completed judicial document produced by investigative agencies, the indictment from the prosecution unit and the referral paper from investigative agencies. A number of factors were analyzed, including the attributes of judicial agencies, the statistics on investigative agency enforcement referral and indicted, the comparison of time spent between and judgment and investigation, the accusation and punishment decided by prosecutor and judge, the discrepancy between the sentence in court and criminal charge referred by the prosecution agencies, and background of defendant and his/her criminal charge and stage and type of violating procurement procedure regulations. The research found the following : the offense of government procurement corruption happens mainly at the “open tender” stage, where the procurement executor has a dual and advantaged position. Ethical constraints fail to prevent the crime. The study makes three recommendations: the need to establish a standard operation procedure (SOP) or to restore the backing of criminal law; using the Criminal Proper Speed Trial Act to ensure the justice requirement of judicial procedure; and providing examples of violations to procurement executors for reference.